MegaDrive20XX
Guest
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2002
- Posts
- 2,402
After the slight misunderstanding between JHendrix in the Capcom thread, it brought up an old question that I had forgot about, but to me has always nagged at me. AND THAT IS...
Which title for the two different respective franchises of Final Fight and Street Fighter do you think works and sounds good? I ask this because I remember some time ago in late '97 reading an article that before Capcom made the game Final Fight they had actually dubbed it Street Fighter '89 for the year it was in development. At that time only the original SF game with the weird punch buttons and some with the 6 button layout was out, and it wasn't nearly as popular as later installments.
and by the way I look at things, well... "How much STREET FIGHTING really takes place in the SF games?" Most of the people in the game all are bad asses at some form or another, I believe "Jack" from AOF would best represent brute force Street Fighting, not the plethora of forms/styles we all see in the SF games... while on the other side of the coin, CAPCOM made a roving beat em' up called Final Fight that actually had people in a literal "Street Fight"
So to me I think I'd have rather the games we know as "Street Fighter" have been called FINAL FIGHT and the Final Fight games be called Street Fighter. Yes we've all grown accustomed to what is, but how much sense does it really make when you take a step back and really look at it? It doesn't. We'd have had...
Final Fight
Super Final Fight
Final Fight Zero
Final Fight EX Plus Alpha
Final Fight III: Third Strike
and so on, and I don't believe it would have been any less successful and would have made a lot more sense. So what do you think? DO YOU LIKE THE NAMES "AS IS" for the respective series, or do you think like me?
MD20XX / Storm Rider
Which title for the two different respective franchises of Final Fight and Street Fighter do you think works and sounds good? I ask this because I remember some time ago in late '97 reading an article that before Capcom made the game Final Fight they had actually dubbed it Street Fighter '89 for the year it was in development. At that time only the original SF game with the weird punch buttons and some with the 6 button layout was out, and it wasn't nearly as popular as later installments.
and by the way I look at things, well... "How much STREET FIGHTING really takes place in the SF games?" Most of the people in the game all are bad asses at some form or another, I believe "Jack" from AOF would best represent brute force Street Fighting, not the plethora of forms/styles we all see in the SF games... while on the other side of the coin, CAPCOM made a roving beat em' up called Final Fight that actually had people in a literal "Street Fight"
So to me I think I'd have rather the games we know as "Street Fighter" have been called FINAL FIGHT and the Final Fight games be called Street Fighter. Yes we've all grown accustomed to what is, but how much sense does it really make when you take a step back and really look at it? It doesn't. We'd have had...
Final Fight
Super Final Fight
Final Fight Zero
Final Fight EX Plus Alpha
Final Fight III: Third Strike
and so on, and I don't believe it would have been any less successful and would have made a lot more sense. So what do you think? DO YOU LIKE THE NAMES "AS IS" for the respective series, or do you think like me?
MD20XX / Storm Rider

Then again, maybe not, I know I would be happy for more side-scrolling beat-'em-ups these days, names be damned.