Dilemma/questions RE: Israeli AF Pilots refusal to fly Airstrikes on West Bank

aria

Former Moderator
Joined
Dec 4, 1977
Posts
39,546
[It's been a while since I've posted something with complex political, ethical and moral questions. Heaven forbid if you think I've gone soft.]

Table of Contents:
- Quick primer on the topic
- questions to consider
- news article from today's AP wire

---------------
QUICK PRIMER
---------------

If you've been following the never-ending story that is Israeli-Palestinian relations, you'll note that Israel is (and has over its history) struck at heads of Palestinian terrorist organizations (i.e. Hamas) by essentially having their air force jets fly in and blow up the place where they're at.

If you haven't wondered yet: Yes, these building tend to be apartment buildings with other, non-terrorists residing in or nearby. And yes: missles don't exactly discriminate in their massive payloads.

There's been controversy all over this tactic, and now there's been a rather unprecedented move of pilots actually refusing, en masse, to go on these missions. Needless to say, its causing some shockwaves.

------------
QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER
------------

- Do you agree with the pilots?
- Would the US/EU ever do this?
- Is this the best solution?
- Should the polits be blamed, regardless?

---------------
ARTICLE
---------------

Israel Grounds Pilots Who Refused Mission

By KARIN LAUB, Associated Press Writer

JERUSALEM - Israel on Thursday temporarily grounded reserve air force pilots who — in an unprecedented protest — condemned airstrikes in the West Bank and Gaza Strip as "immoral" and refused to fly such sorties.


The declaration by 27 pilots, including nine on active duty, was widely criticized in Israel as subversive at a time of war, but it also revived a flagging debate on the ethics of Israel's three-year war on Palestinian militants.


The protest struck a nerve because many Israelis believe their military has higher moral standards than that of their neighbors, and that other countries would have been much more ruthless.


The military is also seen as an institution that binds the fractious nation; Israelis get jittery at signs of cracks in the ranks. The air force in particular is considered key to Israel's survival, and pilots are held in the highest regard. Critics also say such talk gives ammunition to Israel's enemies.


Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said the rebel pilots would be dealt with swiftly.


"Everyone can express his opinion, but it is unacceptable that a group of people in the military would interfere in a subject that does not apply to them," he told Israel TV.


The air force quickly tried to contain the damage. Commander Maj. Gen. Dan Halutz said the nine active pilots, grounded for now, could face suspension and perhaps military jail if they don't retract.


He said the rebels are a tiny minority among thousands of pilots. Hundreds of pilots began circulating declarations Thursday that expressed support for their commanders.


The protesters came under fire for mixing their moral dilemma with political opinion — their declaration said the continued occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip corrupts society.


Even moderate Israelis said this is a mistake, because it could set a precedent. "When the time comes, say, to remove settlers from their homes, other people in the army or in the air force will say they don't want to obey these orders in the same way," said Col. Uri Dromi, an air force reservist.


Veteran journalist Dan Margalit wrote in a front-page commentary in the Maariv daily that the pilots abused their exalted standing.


"If their idea is accepted, Ahmed Yassin and his compatriots in the Hamas leadership will be able to plan the next murder of Jewish children on a Jerusalem bus without interference," Margalit wrote, referring to an August bus bombing that killed 23 people, six of them children.


Only veteran leaders of Israel's dovish left, including Yossi Sarid and Shulamit Aloni of the Meretz party, defended the pilots.


Several hundred Israelis have refused to serve in the West Bank and Gaza. There have been protests such as last weekend's Tel Aviv rally in which several thousand called for ending the occupation. But no major anti-war movement has emerged during the current fighting with the Palestinians, and most Israelis support the military's actions.


The group of 27 is informally led by Brig. Gen. Yiftah Spector, a highly decorated retired pilot who, according to Israeli media, took part in the bombing of an Iraqi nuclear reactor in 1981.


In their petition, the pilots said airstrikes on crowded Palestinian areas are "illegal and immoral."


In three years of fighting, Israeli pilots have carried out hundreds of airstrikes, targeting Palestinian police installations and weapons workshops of militants. The most controversial involve targeted killings in which helicopters — and sometimes warplanes — fire rockets and bombs at cars and homes of Palestinian militants.


Some 140 wanted Palestinians have died in targeted raids, according to Palestinian medical officials, though the figure also includes those killed resisting arrest. More than 100 bystanders have also died, they said.

The Israeli public, traumatized by a Palestinian suicide bombing campaign that has killed hundreds since September 2000, largely supports the targeted killings.

A watershed for some pilots was last year's attack on Salah Shehadeh, leader of the Hamas military wing. A one-ton bomb killed Shehadeh, an assistant and 14 civilians, nine of them children. Halutz, the air force commander, had said he felt the bombing was morally correct.

In response to last month's Jerusalem bombing, Israel accelerated targeted attacks, killing 13 Hamas members and six bystanders in nearly a dozen airstrikes in Gaza City.

One of the 27 pilots, identified only as Capt. Alon, told the Yediot Ahronot daily he was now ashamed to be a member of the air force. "It's an organization that has no qualms about dropping bombs ... on the densest neighborhoods in the world ...," he was quoted as saying.

Brig. Gen. Eliezer Shakedi, a senior air force official, said great efforts are made to keep Palestinian civilians from harm, and that some missions were aborted if the risk to innocents was too high.

It was the first time pilots have come out openly against air force policy. In the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, some expressed reservations about bombing cities and refugee camps but did not go public.
 

JHendrix

Jello Pudding Pop, Y'know? Like that whole Bill C
Joined
Jun 27, 2001
Posts
9,436
Ugly situation, just plain ugly what's going on over there.


Pilots should have NEVER done that though. If for nothing more than it setting a very bad and dangerous precident.

You're a soldier, you follow orders - reguardless of political views.

That said, these mass bombings they're doing while being effective in the whole "killing the badguys" thing, is also killing far too many civilians. That only leads to the creation of innumerably more terrorists, which leads to more bombings. I'm hoping you see the bad cycle.

Still, is there a BETTER way you can think of for killing these bastards? You're fighting a war with terrorists, it's not the easiest thing to do because it's hard to discern who is and isn't a terrorist.

Kind of like the problem we're having in Iraq, cept we're NOT doing the whole mass killing thing.
 

c.t.h

Maxima's Barber
Joined
Apr 17, 2003
Posts
2,350
Yeah, the pilots should follow their orders if they want to be in the military. I have a feeling, they won't be in the military anymore.

And yeah, bombing those buildings isn't the best solutions - but then again, I don't see the families doing anything about Hamsa moving into their building.
 

neobuyer

Master of Disguise,
Joined
Oct 7, 2000
Posts
8,083
I think some brave Israeli food workers should refuse to allow Ariel Sharon unlimited access to the fucking buffet.

That fucker is so fat he looks like Jabba the Hut with a quirky thyroid.

And he doesn't even eat pork.
 

Shred

Bead Banger
Joined
Oct 25, 2001
Posts
1,488
c.t.h said:
Yeah, the pilots should follow their orders if they want to be in the military. I have a feeling, they won't be in the military anymore.

And yeah, bombing those buildings isn't the best solutions - but then again, I don't see the families doing anything about Hamsa moving into their building.

You do realize that the military does not just train mindless machines right? One thing that was hammered into our heads all through basic training was to follow orders unless those orders were something like go over to that village and slaughter all the women and children. Something like that is an order you should question and refuse to follow. Using a 1 ton bomb to try and kill one person sounds like a tad bit of overkill to me.
 

JHendrix

Jello Pudding Pop, Y'know? Like that whole Bill C
Joined
Jun 27, 2001
Posts
9,436
Shred said:
You do realize that the military does not just train mindless machines right? One thing that was hammered into our heads all through basic training was to follow orders unless those orders were something like go over to that village and slaughter all the women and children. Something like that is an order you should question and refuse to follow. Using a 1 ton bomb to try and kill one person sounds like a tad bit of overkill to me.

Excellent fucking point.

EDIT: On one hand you want them to follow orders, the will of the people so to speak (most of Isreal is behind these bombings), but on the other hand you don't want mindless drones who "just follow orders".
 

mog

Bead Banger
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Posts
1,497
c.t.h said:
Yeah, the pilots should follow their orders if they want to be in the military. I have a feeling, they won't be in the military anymore.

And yeah, bombing those buildings isn't the best solutions - but then again, I don't see the families doing anything about Hamsa moving into their building.

Yes. It is obviously the responsibility of families to take up arms against terrorist organizations to keep from being indiscriminately killed.
 

Nesagwa

Beard of Zeus,
20 Year Member
Joined
May 17, 2002
Posts
21,322
A question for bobak first.

Is the israeli military voluntary or is it a draft system?

And jhendrix, do you mean that if they dont bomb civilians that they will become terrorists or that if they dont the terrorists they dont kill will go make more?
 

JHendrix

Jello Pudding Pop, Y'know? Like that whole Bill C
Joined
Jun 27, 2001
Posts
9,436
Nesagwa said:
A question for bobak first.

Is the israeli military voluntary or is it a draft system?

And jhendrix, do you mean that if they dont bomb civilians that they will become terrorists or that if they dont the terrorists they dont kill will go make more?

No, if they kill more innocent civilians there are now more pissed off friends/family of the innocent killed who now probably hate Isreal enough to become a terrorist themselves.

That's what I meant.
 

c.t.h

Maxima's Barber
Joined
Apr 17, 2003
Posts
2,350
Nesagwa said:
A question for bobak first.

Is the israeli military voluntary or is it a draft system?

And jhendrix, do you mean that if they dont bomb civilians that they will become terrorists or that if they dont the terrorists they dont kill will go make more?


There is mandatory military service, but most of these pilots were probably in on their own. And it's not like they asked these pilots to go decapitate children, they asked them to bomb a terrorist hideout.

Anyway, mog: I didn't say that - and it's not really true. I guess you would have a much better way of killing these terrorists, right?

I mean, can you really blame the israelis for hating the palestinians when they are bombing their buses and businesses every month?

There is so much hate in that country, on both sides, it's never going to be resolved. The only way I think that conflict is ever going to end, is one side wiping out the other :oh_no: .
 

c.t.h

Maxima's Barber
Joined
Apr 17, 2003
Posts
2,350
JHendrix said:
No, if they kill more innocent civilians there are now more pissed off friends/family of the innocent killed who now probably hate Isreal enough to become a terrorist themselves.

That's what I meant.

I'm not sure I really buy into that theory - most palestinians over there (and jews alike) already know somebody that's been affected by the situation, and the hate goes back a long long time.
 

mog

Bead Banger
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Posts
1,497
c.t.h said:
There is mandatory military service, but most of these pilots were probably in on their own. And it's not like they asked these pilots to go decapitate children, they asked them to bomb a terrorist hideout.

Anyway, mog: I didn't say that - and it's not really true. I guess you would have a much better way of killing these terrorists, right?

I mean, can you really blame the israelis for hating the palestinians when they are bombing their buses and businesses every month?

There is so much hate in that country, on both sides, it's never going to be resolved. The only way I think that conflict is ever going to end, is one side wiping out the other :oh_no: .

...And yeah, bombing those buildings isn't the best solutions - but then again, I don't see the families doing anything about Hamsa moving into their building.

So what do you suggest? They submit a petition to the Board of Directors of their apartment to have Hamas members evicted?
 

Nesagwa

Beard of Zeus,
20 Year Member
Joined
May 17, 2002
Posts
21,322
Well if its mandatory then yeah, fight the system or whatever.

The only way to fix this situation is to hook a flux capacitor to my volvo and make sure Isreal was never created.
 

Shred

Bead Banger
Joined
Oct 25, 2001
Posts
1,488
c.t.h said:
There is mandatory military service, but most of these pilots were probably in on their own. And it's not like they asked these pilots to go decapitate children, they asked them to bomb a terrorist hideout.

Anyway, mog: I didn't say that - and it's not really true. I guess you would have a much better way of killing these terrorists, right?

I mean, can you really blame the israelis for hating the palestinians when they are bombing their buses and businesses every month?

There is so much hate in that country, on both sides, it's never going to be resolved. The only way I think that conflict is ever going to end, is one side wiping out the other :oh_no: .

They are asked to bomb terrorist hideouts that happen to be apartment buildings where civilians also live. Do you think you could constantly knowingly kill people who are guilty of nothing other than being in the wrong place?
And no I don't know of any other way to take these terroists out but that is not the issue here. These pilot's have decided that they do not want the weight of killing a dozen or so civilians just to take out one or two terrorists on their conscience. They actually need more people like that on both sides of that messed up fight then they might actually have a chance for peace.
 

c.t.h

Maxima's Barber
Joined
Apr 17, 2003
Posts
2,350
Listen, all I said is they shouldn't be in the military then.

Did I ever say anything else?

I don't *know* enough about the bombings they were asked to do - the article I read said most of them were helicopter pilots operating RPGs.

I'm staying out of this discussion now, I'm not in the mood to get into another stupidly long debate.
 

BlackSpy

Tsrgoihrea,
20 Year Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2002
Posts
2,959
Who the fuck has hacked Shred's account?

Fess up.

I will not have myself agreeing with this man on political issues.

I demand an explanation.
 

BlackSpy

Tsrgoihrea,
20 Year Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2002
Posts
2,959
Anyway, the point is not whether they are conscripts or volunteers. The Nuremburg trials proved that any soldier is responsible to the conventions of war and his own morality. Doing something wrong is not excuseable if you are a volunteer. What's wrong is wrong, the prepetrator must carry the can, whether ordered on pain of death or not.

There is no excuse if the facts are known to the perpetrator.
 

aria

Former Moderator
Joined
Dec 4, 1977
Posts
39,546
as was said earlier, it's mandatory military service -not quite a draft, since people must serve x amount of years anyway. Though in times of great crisis (Yom Kippur War, et al), there's probably and immediate draft.

Some of these individuals were reservists, which implies they were voluntarily going to be pilots.

A few more considerations:

- the Israeli counterpart to the CIA is very good at what they do. They've come up with some very creative and effective ways of eliminating individuals rather than shooting missles at apartment complexes.
- with that noted, it seems to imply that there could be a thought being acted on, essentially: "If we start adding a little collateral damage, then their own kin will turn them in or risk getting killed too." That theory seems to be backfiring and instead creating more angry militants and cohesion among the Palestinians who feel under attack.
- with all of that said, how on earth do you stop these suicide bombers before they intentionally, suddenly kill themselves. That's the biggest problem, they're intending to die anyway.
 

bokmeow

Ned's Ninja Academy Dropout
Joined
Apr 11, 2002
Posts
11,314
BlackSpy said:
Who the fuck has hacked Shred's account?

Fess up.

I will not have myself agreeing with this man on political issues.

I demand an explanation.

Heh, you were thinking what I was thinking. Except I believe Shred usually has a level head and will argue for his platform, so it surprised me a little bit but it didn't throw me off.
 

Crovax

Rasputin's Rose Gardener
Joined
Aug 9, 2002
Posts
701
This is just a really, really messed up situation any way you look at it. On the one hand, I'm glad to see that finally a few people in positions of (limited) power are realizing that violence just begets more violence. On the other hand, I think that it sets a dangerous precedent, and military insubordination is something that is never healthy. However, as Black Spy noted, there is also the precedent set at the Nuremburg war crimes trials that "I was just following orders," is not a valid defense for an individual comitting war crimes.

taking all that into consideration, I think that my main problem with the actions of the pilots (which I fell is commendable in its underlying moral foundation) is that they effectively tried to go on strike in the military. if they had protested by simply resigning on the same grounds that they have cited for grounding themselves, it wouldn't be such a mess. However, I have no idea what their individual situations are, and maybe that simply wasn't an option. I know that my friend who enlisted in the US Army had a hell of a time getting out because there were certain obligations attached to his enlistment. Maybe they face the same issue (ie they are required to serve a certain amount of time, so they simply cannot quit and keep their citizenship or something).

In any case, I'm sure things will get resolved sooner than later. and unfortunately for these men, it sounds like Sharon is in no mood to play games.
 
Top