- Joined
- Jan 4, 2002
- Posts
- 9,358
Yep, it's true.
I've just run a comparison with all my AES systems (4 in total) and it's pretty EVIDENT older system (the ones with the first revion of the board, aka those needing the AC PRO-POW of PRO-POW2) have better picture quality and sound.
The latter systems (those using the PRO-POW3 adaptor) have lower colour dept, lower video output (with graphic generated like in 'square boxes' of pixel) and poorest sound.
All the systems were tested with Matrimelee and pure RGB output.
Well, I would say the first revision of the board is almost identical to MVS, while the latter was maybe toned down to reduce chipset production costs as well as power needs (PRO-POW3 is way different from PRO-POW and PRO-POW2).
Discuss.
<small>[ June 29, 2003, 06:10 PM: Message edited by: Shito ]</small>
I've just run a comparison with all my AES systems (4 in total) and it's pretty EVIDENT older system (the ones with the first revion of the board, aka those needing the AC PRO-POW of PRO-POW2) have better picture quality and sound.
The latter systems (those using the PRO-POW3 adaptor) have lower colour dept, lower video output (with graphic generated like in 'square boxes' of pixel) and poorest sound.
All the systems were tested with Matrimelee and pure RGB output.
Well, I would say the first revision of the board is almost identical to MVS, while the latter was maybe toned down to reduce chipset production costs as well as power needs (PRO-POW3 is way different from PRO-POW and PRO-POW2).
Discuss.
<small>[ June 29, 2003, 06:10 PM: Message edited by: Shito ]</small>

) but the composite out on my system with the daughterboard fix is probably the cleanest I've seen on any homecart system. It's better than my Japanese cart system (serial in the 2##,###) and my svideo modded early cart system without the daughterboard fix (composite out on that one is a mess, colors bleed all over the place)
