With all this talk about the 'crystal system' (whether it is or not the follow-up to the MVS hardware), I started thinking.
Do we really want new hardware?
If rumours prove true and the Neo/SNK franchises enjoy more development with offices in the US, should they go with the already widely distributed MVS/AES hardware? New hardware?
For me, I say no, I am more than happy with more MVS games with AES releases.
I mean wont new hardware mean an end to home Neo gaming?
And is new technology really that important? For my money, the MVS pumps out pure 2D goodness that I never get tired of, and its a system that cranks out great 2D games so long as artists work overtime on art, sound, and innovative gameplay.
The whole world is obsessed with faster and better game hardware, especially in the home, and look where its taken us - polygon city. It's left us with a bunch of consoles that are 2D lemons.
Do graphics ALWAYS have to get better and better (whatever that means)? When is it enough? And when is gameplay and game design more important than aesthetics? For my money Neo games are among the best looking ever created.
I mean think of games in general, video or not. Has anyone ever said "oh, chess is outdated, the pieces need to be changed and made of better material, and the game itself needs to be tweeked. How about knights moving 5 spaces instead of 3?" <IMG SRC="smilies/biggrin.gif" border="0">
Try and respond in this form:
1. simple yes or no - new hardware or not?
2. explain ur answer
Lee (garg7) http://www.neogeotemple.com
[ January 01, 2002: Message edited by: gargoyle7 ]
Do we really want new hardware?
If rumours prove true and the Neo/SNK franchises enjoy more development with offices in the US, should they go with the already widely distributed MVS/AES hardware? New hardware?
For me, I say no, I am more than happy with more MVS games with AES releases.
I mean wont new hardware mean an end to home Neo gaming?
And is new technology really that important? For my money, the MVS pumps out pure 2D goodness that I never get tired of, and its a system that cranks out great 2D games so long as artists work overtime on art, sound, and innovative gameplay.
The whole world is obsessed with faster and better game hardware, especially in the home, and look where its taken us - polygon city. It's left us with a bunch of consoles that are 2D lemons.
Do graphics ALWAYS have to get better and better (whatever that means)? When is it enough? And when is gameplay and game design more important than aesthetics? For my money Neo games are among the best looking ever created.
I mean think of games in general, video or not. Has anyone ever said "oh, chess is outdated, the pieces need to be changed and made of better material, and the game itself needs to be tweeked. How about knights moving 5 spaces instead of 3?" <IMG SRC="smilies/biggrin.gif" border="0">
Try and respond in this form:
1. simple yes or no - new hardware or not?
2. explain ur answer
Lee (garg7) http://www.neogeotemple.com
[ January 01, 2002: Message edited by: gargoyle7 ]
