Loopz
Formerly Punjab,
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2001
- Posts
- 12,871
I know that what I am about to write will anger many of you to your core, but put passion aside for a second and listen to reason. Now, this discussion has nothing to do with the companies who fronted these consoles, I'm not an idiot and do not need to be told the dfference between SNK and Microsoft. This comparison has solely to do with hardware, and time of release...
Now, we can all agree that the current age of gaming (Japanese roots, 1985-present) basically began with the release of the NES. Its main competitor, the Master System, failed on both sides of the globe. The 2nd wave of this era, the 16-bit age, began with the release of three consoles, the Super NES (Super Fami), Genesis (MegaDrive), and TurboGrafx(PC Engine). Now, in the midst of all this, a powerful dark horse was released...the Neo Geo AES. It was sickeningly powerful compared to its competitors, yet was much maligned by the media because of its price, SNK's inexperience in the market, and mostly shoddy first gen software with a few games that show a glimmer of promise...
Fast forward to the 3D era, which began with the PlayStation, Saturn, and N64. The second iteration of this hardware scrum began with the release of the Dreamcast, along with the PlayStation 2 and GameCube. In the middle of these, another powerful dark horse emerges, once again far outclassing its rivals in pure performance...the XBox. A launch also marred by mostly shit first gen software, yet with a few games that show brilliance and insane promise...
Another similarity between these two is that they both posess groundbreaking features, the Neo most notably with the first memory card, and the Xbox with its hard drive.
Now this is just the opening shot in this discussion, and before your react angrily with fanboy flamage, just really sit and think about it...it makes more sense than you might think. After all, think about the days when the Neo emerged...don't you think most gamers were quick to deride the system as an expensive turd, not worthy of residing next to their gleaming new Super NES and Genesis systems? Looking forward to chewing this one over with the brighter folks on this board..........
Now, we can all agree that the current age of gaming (Japanese roots, 1985-present) basically began with the release of the NES. Its main competitor, the Master System, failed on both sides of the globe. The 2nd wave of this era, the 16-bit age, began with the release of three consoles, the Super NES (Super Fami), Genesis (MegaDrive), and TurboGrafx(PC Engine). Now, in the midst of all this, a powerful dark horse was released...the Neo Geo AES. It was sickeningly powerful compared to its competitors, yet was much maligned by the media because of its price, SNK's inexperience in the market, and mostly shoddy first gen software with a few games that show a glimmer of promise...
Fast forward to the 3D era, which began with the PlayStation, Saturn, and N64. The second iteration of this hardware scrum began with the release of the Dreamcast, along with the PlayStation 2 and GameCube. In the middle of these, another powerful dark horse emerges, once again far outclassing its rivals in pure performance...the XBox. A launch also marred by mostly shit first gen software, yet with a few games that show brilliance and insane promise...
Another similarity between these two is that they both posess groundbreaking features, the Neo most notably with the first memory card, and the Xbox with its hard drive.
Now this is just the opening shot in this discussion, and before your react angrily with fanboy flamage, just really sit and think about it...it makes more sense than you might think. After all, think about the days when the Neo emerged...don't you think most gamers were quick to deride the system as an expensive turd, not worthy of residing next to their gleaming new Super NES and Genesis systems? Looking forward to chewing this one over with the brighter folks on this board..........