Terry Power
Benimaru's Hairdresser
- Joined
- May 3, 2002
- Posts
- 776
Which one do you like more, 3 vs 3 or 4 vs 4? I like 4 vs 4 more!
3 vs 3 or 4 vs 4?
- Thread starter Terry Power
- Start date
Benimaru's Hairdresser
Iori Branford
NEST Puppet
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2001
- Posts
- 169
I gotta go with 4v4. 6v6...now that would be something. A war, almost.
Daisuke Jigen
R.I.P.,, Dear Friend,
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2000
- Posts
- 4,577
3 on 3, the way it was meant to be.
The True Warrior
Edo Express Delivery Guy
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2002
- Posts
- 332
1-on-1...period.
Just be sure to bring two other guys along in case your opponent starts talkin' smack... <img src="graemlins/smirk.gif" border="0" alt="[Smirk]" />
Just be sure to bring two other guys along in case your opponent starts talkin' smack... <img src="graemlins/smirk.gif" border="0" alt="[Smirk]" />
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2000
- Posts
- 60,434
6 vs 6 is a good idea
I never use 4 people on a team in 2001 usually 1 or 2 3 if I like the characters and actually use them well.
I never use 4 people on a team in 2001 usually 1 or 2 3 if I like the characters and actually use them well.
Thunderfoot
Kabuki Klasher
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2001
- Posts
- 124
Definitely 3 vs 3
Overkill Geyser
Ninja Combat Warrior
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2001
- Posts
- 529
I gotta admit; I was getting used to 4-on-4. Not the strikers, though. Still, it showed that KOF was evolving.
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2002
- Posts
- 9,543
Just give me 3-on-3, though I usually only have to used 1. 
4 vs 4's saving trait was no Striker usage.
Now if you could do slightly more damage with it...
I've even tried using four man teams more recently.
I prefer having an extra man than a useless Striker anyday.
...Even won a few boss matches with a 4 man team.
A true challenge considering the crap damage you deal and receive.
[ September 06, 2002: Message edited by: YeldellGW ]
[ September 06, 2002: Message edited by: YeldellGW ]</p>
Now if you could do slightly more damage with it...
I've even tried using four man teams more recently.
I prefer having an extra man than a useless Striker anyday.
...Even won a few boss matches with a 4 man team.
A true challenge considering the crap damage you deal and receive.
[ September 06, 2002: Message edited by: YeldellGW ]
[ September 06, 2002: Message edited by: YeldellGW ]</p>
Samurai Hamster
Edo Express Delivery Guy
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2002
- Posts
- 338
4 vs 4 makes your characters too weak ,
Its all about 3 vs 3 or less if your the man
Its all about 3 vs 3 or less if your the man
Overkill Geyser
Ninja Combat Warrior
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2001
- Posts
- 529
Hol' up, now! If it's a question of skillz, I'll take one-on-one, anyday! I'm just saying, 4-on-4 made KOF look like it was going somewhere!
SilverAngel
Member,
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2001
- Posts
- 2,176
i do like 3 on 3 but i was starting to get used to 4 on 4. I was a little dissapointed with it being 3 on 3 again this year but hey ney mind! I really liked it in 2k1 when you choose either 4 players or 3 players and a striker that was a good idea!
Zeekade Zarathos
Krizalids Fashion Designer
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2001
- Posts
- 1,845
Devil_Gans
Bu, ,
- Joined
- May 21, 2001
- Posts
- 4,718
3 on 3.Its the way its meant to be played.
As for 4 on 4, kof 2k1 allowed that at the expense of your fighters taking huge damage and delivering little damage.I hate the CvS style ratio system KOF 2k1 implemented.KOF 2k1 is still a great game.
[ September 07, 2002: Message edited by: Devil_Gans ]</p>
As for 4 on 4, kof 2k1 allowed that at the expense of your fighters taking huge damage and delivering little damage.I hate the CvS style ratio system KOF 2k1 implemented.KOF 2k1 is still a great game.
[ September 07, 2002: Message edited by: Devil_Gans ]</p>