aria
Former Moderator
- Joined
- Dec 4, 1977
- Posts
- 39,546
In the interest of helping bring the Neo-Geo.com reviews section to the next level, I am instituting a stricter quality-standard that the previous, extremely-lax standard.
- What this mainly means is that I will be much more likely to ask for a revision of a submitted review, with editorial feedback.
-This is not to discourage reviews, I will make a reasonable effort to work with all writers to get their review on the site, with as many revisions as necessary. (In fact, I want to try help people become better writers)
Note:
THIS IS NOT RETROACTIVE.
(i.e. I'm not going to delete current reviews under this standard. This only applies to new reviews).
All discretionary matters are left up to the editor.
Thank you, and I look forward to new submissions.
In fact, here are some suggestions:
<a href="http://www.neo-geo.com/cgi-local/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=18&t=006334" target="_blank">Suggested Reviews</a>
[ November 03, 2002: Message edited by: Bobak ]</p>
- What this mainly means is that I will be much more likely to ask for a revision of a submitted review, with editorial feedback.
-This is not to discourage reviews, I will make a reasonable effort to work with all writers to get their review on the site, with as many revisions as necessary. (In fact, I want to try help people become better writers)
Note:
THIS IS NOT RETROACTIVE.
(i.e. I'm not going to delete current reviews under this standard. This only applies to new reviews).
All discretionary matters are left up to the editor.
Thank you, and I look forward to new submissions.
In fact, here are some suggestions:
<a href="http://www.neo-geo.com/cgi-local/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=18&t=006334" target="_blank">Suggested Reviews</a>
[ November 03, 2002: Message edited by: Bobak ]</p>
