aria
Former Moderator
- Joined
- Dec 4, 1977
- Posts
- 39,546
Taking a second from Matrimelee, we turn out attention to Piracimelee (or SNK v. NGF, but this one didn't debut at e3 wink )
PROGRESS REPORT:
In our last episode, Playmore had decided to stop suing NGF and instead go after the two accused counterfeiters themselves: Dion Dakis and Chris Ray. The Judge set dates for possible settlement (where both sides come to an agreement where one pays the other something slightly less -preventing the case from going to a very costly trial) as well as dates to end discovery efforts (the time before the actual trial where both sides can look at each others documents and information in order to formulate their court strategies).
In the Month of May, we see that Chris Ray, then Dion Dakis filed Answers to the Amended Complaint of Playmore et al. Playmore amended their complaint by changing who it was they were suing from NGF to the two individuals. In a Complaint, a Plaintiff states (basically) what it is that the defendants did, what law(s) they broke, and what punishment/damages they seek from the Defendants. In the Answers that Dakis and Ray submitted, they have made their (basic) arguments on why they think they have not broken the law (otherwise their silence on any issue would mean that they agree and are guilty of the issue).
What does this mean? It means that now that the Answers were filed, we have a full case ready to go to trial if (a) settlement doesn't work out and (b) when the discovery period is complete.
The final two items on the docket (the most recent things) are requests by Playmore et al for the defendant Dion Dakis to respond to special interrogatories/document requests. what does that mean? An interrgatory is a form of discovery where one side sends a list of questions to the other for them to answer (and the must answer them by law). Interrogatories can also include requests for business records (which may be the case here since they include a request for documents). The plaintiffs are moving to compell Dion Dakis to answer their interrogatory requests: this is easy to interpret as Dion Dakis is not answering their question (or producing the documents they requested) either (a) fast enough or (b) refusing to. Either way, Playmore is asking the Court (Judge) to force them under penalty of law to comply. Whether the Judge will or not is not listed yet (they set a date in mid-June to decide that matter).
In summary:
Things are moving -it will be interesting to see how that motion to compell goes.
(Ha! You think I'm going to just tell you what I wrote above again? Think again )
---------------------
THE DOCKET
---------------------
4/7/03 44 SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge David O. Carter setting discovery
cut-off: 3/26/04; Motion cut-off: 7/12/04; Pretrial
conference: 8/2/04 at 8:30am; Jury trial: 8/24/04 at 8:30am;
(see document for further specifics) (mt)
[Entry date 04/10/03]
4/15/03 45 STANDING ORDER by Discovery Marc L. Goldman setting
settlement conference for 6/18/03 at 9:30am (see document
for further specifics) (mt) [Entry date 04/16/03]
4/15/03 46 NOTICE AND REQUEST Of Settlement Procedure Selection filed
Parties request to appear before Magistrate Judge Marc L.
Goldman for settlement proceedings Order by Judge David O.
Carter granting settlement procedure selection request
[46-1] (mt) [Entry date 04/16/03]
5/6/03 47 STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge David O. Carter for
protective order re confidential information (see document
for specifics) (mt) [Entry date 05/07/03]
5/20/03 48 ANSWER filed by defendant Chris Ray to plaintiff's first
amended complaint [41-1] (mt) [Entry date 05/23/03]
5/20/03 49 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by defendant Chris Ray
(mt) [Entry date 05/23/03]
5/22/03 50 ANSWER filed by defendant Dion Dakis to first amended
complaint [41-1] (mt) [Entry date 05/27/03]
5/23/03 51 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION by plaintiffs Playmore
Corporation, SNK Neogeo USA Corp to compel Dion Dakis dba
Neogeo Freak's responses to request for special
interrogatories and demand for documents, sets one; motion
hearing set for 8:30 6/16/03; Lodged proposed order (mt)
[Entry date 05/27/03]
5/23/03 52 DECLARATION of Jason B Witten by plaintiffs Playmore
Corporation, SNK Neogeo USA Corp in support of motion to
compel Dion Dakis dba Neogeo Freak's responses to request
for special interrogatories and demand for documents, sets
one [51-1] (mt) [Entry date 05/27/03]
PROGRESS REPORT:
In our last episode, Playmore had decided to stop suing NGF and instead go after the two accused counterfeiters themselves: Dion Dakis and Chris Ray. The Judge set dates for possible settlement (where both sides come to an agreement where one pays the other something slightly less -preventing the case from going to a very costly trial) as well as dates to end discovery efforts (the time before the actual trial where both sides can look at each others documents and information in order to formulate their court strategies).
In the Month of May, we see that Chris Ray, then Dion Dakis filed Answers to the Amended Complaint of Playmore et al. Playmore amended their complaint by changing who it was they were suing from NGF to the two individuals. In a Complaint, a Plaintiff states (basically) what it is that the defendants did, what law(s) they broke, and what punishment/damages they seek from the Defendants. In the Answers that Dakis and Ray submitted, they have made their (basic) arguments on why they think they have not broken the law (otherwise their silence on any issue would mean that they agree and are guilty of the issue).
What does this mean? It means that now that the Answers were filed, we have a full case ready to go to trial if (a) settlement doesn't work out and (b) when the discovery period is complete.
The final two items on the docket (the most recent things) are requests by Playmore et al for the defendant Dion Dakis to respond to special interrogatories/document requests. what does that mean? An interrgatory is a form of discovery where one side sends a list of questions to the other for them to answer (and the must answer them by law). Interrogatories can also include requests for business records (which may be the case here since they include a request for documents). The plaintiffs are moving to compell Dion Dakis to answer their interrogatory requests: this is easy to interpret as Dion Dakis is not answering their question (or producing the documents they requested) either (a) fast enough or (b) refusing to. Either way, Playmore is asking the Court (Judge) to force them under penalty of law to comply. Whether the Judge will or not is not listed yet (they set a date in mid-June to decide that matter).
In summary:
Things are moving -it will be interesting to see how that motion to compell goes.
(Ha! You think I'm going to just tell you what I wrote above again? Think again )
---------------------
THE DOCKET
---------------------
4/7/03 44 SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge David O. Carter setting discovery
cut-off: 3/26/04; Motion cut-off: 7/12/04; Pretrial
conference: 8/2/04 at 8:30am; Jury trial: 8/24/04 at 8:30am;
(see document for further specifics) (mt)
[Entry date 04/10/03]
4/15/03 45 STANDING ORDER by Discovery Marc L. Goldman setting
settlement conference for 6/18/03 at 9:30am (see document
for further specifics) (mt) [Entry date 04/16/03]
4/15/03 46 NOTICE AND REQUEST Of Settlement Procedure Selection filed
Parties request to appear before Magistrate Judge Marc L.
Goldman for settlement proceedings Order by Judge David O.
Carter granting settlement procedure selection request
[46-1] (mt) [Entry date 04/16/03]
5/6/03 47 STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge David O. Carter for
protective order re confidential information (see document
for specifics) (mt) [Entry date 05/07/03]
5/20/03 48 ANSWER filed by defendant Chris Ray to plaintiff's first
amended complaint [41-1] (mt) [Entry date 05/23/03]
5/20/03 49 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by defendant Chris Ray
(mt) [Entry date 05/23/03]
5/22/03 50 ANSWER filed by defendant Dion Dakis to first amended
complaint [41-1] (mt) [Entry date 05/27/03]
5/23/03 51 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION by plaintiffs Playmore
Corporation, SNK Neogeo USA Corp to compel Dion Dakis dba
Neogeo Freak's responses to request for special
interrogatories and demand for documents, sets one; motion
hearing set for 8:30 6/16/03; Lodged proposed order (mt)
[Entry date 05/27/03]
5/23/03 52 DECLARATION of Jason B Witten by plaintiffs Playmore
Corporation, SNK Neogeo USA Corp in support of motion to
compel Dion Dakis dba Neogeo Freak's responses to request
for special interrogatories and demand for documents, sets
one [51-1] (mt) [Entry date 05/27/03]