We already have a rule that sigs shouldn't exceed 100K in size. And you're quite right that there should be resolution limits as well. Usually when you ask the member to please change his sig, he will be cool about it. Then if he doesn't, other people join in and flame him, and eventually he WILL change it.BlackSpy:
Something really needs to be done about sig sizes. Not just bytes but length
Blaster Keaton's for one is insane just now. I run my desktop at a 1280x1024 and it fills a whole screen.
We really need some rules.
<a href="http://www.neo-geo.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=020307" target="_blank">http://www.neo-geo.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=020307</a>chimpmeister:
Anyway, link to the offending thread with his sig? eye
it's not going to happen unless/until the board changes software.TriShield:
A software change should be imposed that only displays a member's sig once per thread.
Everyone posts their sigs with every post in a thread, which is really annoying.
Threads are half sig images. oh_no
I see that Blaster Keaton has fixed his sig (only about 50k now), but you're right that Raziel's sig is a ridiculous 352K, and it isn't even that great. Kind of stupid actually. He should change it out to one under 100K in size . . . or if he doesn't, it is likely his sig will be cleaned/locked. annoyedBBH:
<a href="http://www.neo-geo.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=020307" target="_blank">http://www.neo-geo.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=020307</a>chimpmeister:
Anyway, link to the offending thread with his sig? eye
also worth noting in that thread is that Razial has a 352k animated .gif too. oh_no
loco
Well imagine how it feels in 800x600 landBlackSpy:
Blaster Keaton's for one is insane just now. I run my desktop at a 1280x1024 and it fills a whole screen.
True that.BBH:
it's not going to happen unless/until the board changes software.TriShield:
A software change should be imposed that only displays a member's sig once per thread.
Everyone posts their sigs with every post in a thread, which is really annoying.
Threads are half sig images. oh_no
so stop asking already.
GameFAQs is the other way..... winkAmano Jacu:
I sometimes use a trick... If I want to read a thread without sigs or avatars, I just click the reply button and look at the bottom of the reply page, the thread appears there without sigs nor avatars. It only works in not too long threads, though.
Anyway we SHOULD have an option to disable the viewing of sigs. And make a sig appear only ONCE per thread. Or put strong limits on their size/dimenson. Or even better, eliminate them all!![]()
Wasn't that how it was in a previous version of the UBB software? spockTriShield:
A software change should be imposed that only displays a member's sig once per thread.
Everyone posts their sigs with every post in a thread, which is really annoying.
Threads are half sig images. oh_no
half a screen? wtf?Amano Jacu trying not to make it larger than 100 kb, longer than say half a screen, and hotter than Bay watch mr_t
You missed the obvious sarcasm. shamesupergoose79:
half a screen? wtf?Amano Jacu trying not to make it larger than 100 kb, longer than say half a screen, and hotter than Bay watch mr_t
make it 450x100 or less including text & links.
hmm ... guess, i did. where is it? spocktrying not to make it larger than 100 kb, longer than say half a screen, and hotter than Bay watch
) some people may judge them to be "too hot". I was just thinking to make a comparision with something that featured gorgeous ladies insinuating breasts and "Bay Watch" came to my mind.I agree. There could be an option of just disabling viewing other people's sigs. That'd be heaven.Bobak:
I wouldn't be opposed to just eliminating the things.
Or at the very least keeping it to text-only.
That would be an excellent idea.Bobak:
Or at the very least keeping it to text-only.