Blair would be convicted of war crimes?

Bluevoodu

Kyokugen's Student
Joined
Aug 22, 2001
Posts
3,189
I was reading on a UK news site.. if Blair works with the US and attacks Iraq... they would seek to prosecute him on war crime charges... since he is in the European Union....

Anyone else heard about this?

Doesn't this seem like black mail?

†B†V†
 

rugal2000

, Troll Me, , Cuz I is 3lit3, ,
Joined
Aug 31, 2000
Posts
1,732
Theres no chance of Tony Blair being charged on war crimes. I think the Hague will be busy for the next few years with subhuman serbian scum.
 

BIG

sony fanboy
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
7,205
Well,if he does go to war and help the U.S.,he is in violation of the European Union,therefore,he should be tried as a war criminal.
 

Amano Jacu

Charles Barkley
Joined
Sep 11, 2001
Posts
8,594
Well, Aznar, the president of the Spanish Gov is Bush's most loyal dog and gives total support to USA in this matter... I just hope he gets convicted for war crimes too!
 

skam

Super Spy Agent
Joined
Dec 16, 2002
Posts
616
I dunno, I think Blair's even further up Bush's arse to be honest - he's just given Bush permission to build an aerial thing for the new national defence system on British land. Obviously Britain isn't covered by the national defence system so why bend over so shamefully like that?

The man's a fucking spineless no mark.
 

toy_brain

Amano's Drinking Buddy
Joined
Jun 27, 2001
Posts
2,688
For some reason, the thought of seeing that smug, grinning, PR-bitch-boy, puppet of a Prime minister we have being hauled up and locked away on charges of war crimes is quite appealing.

What is less appealing is trying to find someone to replace him. He might be bad, but would you really want a berk like John Prescott running the country? oh_no
 

rugal2000

, Troll Me, , Cuz I is 3lit3, ,
Joined
Aug 31, 2000
Posts
1,732
Its true Blair's cheesy, grinning face , his frustrated thespian ways,his high pitched voice. his receding hairline, and "trendy" dad outlook, and his ugly bitch of a wife......all these things get on people's nerves......BUT he thinks he's doing whats best for britain.And maybe he is.

But Its his overacting that gets on my nerves....that face he put on in front of the camera when addressing the media after Diana died it was ......so retarded. He looked like he was dying for a crap.....rather than someone touched by grief

<small>[ February 07, 2003, 08:08 AM: Message edited by: rugal2000 ]</small>
 

Phoenix Down

Flagstaff Up,
20 Year Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Posts
3,669
Even people in the USA can agree that Blair is more a follower than anything else... :)

Let me ask you all non-USA citizens something: what happened in the last few years that made the rest of the world distrust anything and everything the USA says? Our country has certainly done some stupid shit, but so has every other country that's ever existed. Does the rest of the world honestly think we're making all this stuff up? That we as Americans feel like we have to bomb somebody every few years because we have nothing better to do??? What concerns me more is not that the U.N. doesn't agree with us, it's that they made up their mind long before Colin Powell gave his speech.

I've made jokes in some of the other threads, but I seriously would NOT like to go to war with Iraq if there's any way possible to avoid it. However, if there is no alternative then it must be done.
 

skam

Super Spy Agent
Joined
Dec 16, 2002
Posts
616
Bluevoodu:
does most of UK hate him or something? I really like him... I really do.

†B†V†
either I've lost my ability to spot sarcasm, or you're not joking.
 

Lastblade

Friend me on Facebook!,
20 Year Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2001
Posts
5,885
I like his accent, anybody else feel the same way?? :p
 

rugal2000

, Troll Me, , Cuz I is 3lit3, ,
Joined
Aug 31, 2000
Posts
1,732
"Let me ask you all non-USA citizens something: what happened in the last few years that made the rest of the world distrust anything and everything the USA says? "

Im sorry to say the answer is.........G W Bush.

THe agenda he brings is different to what Bill Clinton had. I liked Bill Clinton......and you never really heard a lot of this stuff U hear now in Bills days.

Only 3 years ago.....America was still a society for many parts of the world to aspire to. People had respect for american institutions like the 5th amendment....people had respect for the different cultures and races that built America....and for american traditions like thanksgiving.

But since Bush came to power...American foreign policy and government attitudes towards arabs has become akin to Hitler........I mean a whole segment of the population being forced to register papers and only the males at that??? DOesnt this ring echoes of Nazi Germany and the treatment of jews years before the war. And what of the new laws making it okay to detain without trial.........surely that isnt very american.That sounds more like Saddams Iraq.

The fact is G W is pissing in the face of all the deserved respect ordinary american people and institutions had worldwide and stil deserve.

Its time for ordinary americans to reclaim their great country and the spirit of their forefathers.....instead of letting Bush bring war and hatred on america cos the zionist corporations have him in their back pocket and are insulting American people with their ridiculous TV coverage of the conflicts.

Dan Rather was over here in england saying the same thing a month ago.

<small>[ February 07, 2003, 04:18 PM: Message edited by: rugal2000 ]</small>
 

Phoenix Down

Flagstaff Up,
20 Year Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Posts
3,669
rugal2000:
"Let me ask you all non-USA citizens something: what happened in the last few years that made the rest of the world distrust anything and everything the USA says? "

Im sorry to say the answer is.........G W Bush.
THe agenda he brings is different to what Bill Clinton had. I liked Bill Clinton......and you never really heard a lot of this stuff U hear now.
So you condemn an entire country because of one man, regardless of whether he's President or some bum on the street corner. Unbelievable. That's like me saying that everyone in the UK sucks because I don't like Blair, or everyone in Iraq is evil just because Saddam is leader there.

If that's the truth then it's a pretty sorry excuse. frown
 

BlackSpy

Tsrgoihrea,
20 Year Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2002
Posts
2,959
B.I.GPSYCHE:
Well,if he does go to war and help the U.S.,he is in violation of the European Union,therefore,he should be tried as a war criminal.
You clearly have so little idea of what the EU is its almost funny.
 

Metal Slug

Handheld Hitter,
Joined
Oct 14, 2000
Posts
2,823
Phoenix Down:
rugal2000:
"Let me ask you all non-USA citizens something: what happened in the last few years that made the rest of the world distrust anything and everything the USA says? "

Im sorry to say the answer is.........G W Bush.
THe agenda he brings is different to what Bill Clinton had. I liked Bill Clinton......and you never really heard a lot of this stuff U hear now.
So you condemn an entire country because of one man, regardless of whether he's President or some bum on the street corner. Unbelievable. That's like me saying that everyone in the UK sucks because I don't like Blair, or everyone in Iraq is evil just because Saddam is leader there.

If that's the truth then it's a pretty sorry excuse. :(
No Pheonix, Rugals got a point.

The rest of the world doesn't have issues with the 'average' american.

But the rest of the world looks at GW, hear's his views on world affairs, see's him back out of important treaties, refuse to sign others, expect US troops to have immunity from prosecution, refuse to put pressure on Israel while they ignore UN resolutions, imply that the US will act without UN approval.....

And of course, START a land war.
Thats one of the big differences with this Gulf war, for a lot of people.

Its simple for a lot of people.
Those who 'start' wars are aggressors.

The rest of the industrialised world does not hate America or Americans.
But they do feel that the US under the Bush administration is only interested in world affairs that directly affect the US.

That and the perecieved double-standards mentioned above are damaging the US' reputation abroard.
This will inevitably mean that the rest of the world will be more 'careful' about accepting what the present administration says at 'face value'

Although in this case its really the whole 'Starting' a war thing that doesn't sit well with the peace-loving nations of Europe.

Although if y'all could show beyond any doubt that Saddam does still have the thousands of litres of Anthrax you sold him, it might sway some of world opinion.

Countries like France and Germany won't want to leap into a major conflict without really convincing evidence.

We're talking about killing a lot of people!
Not all are gonna be evil terrorists either.

We all have to be sure.
And a lot of people are not.
Some of those wonder if the US cares about the rest of the world anyway!

Besides, the full fury of the US has yet to bring Osama Bin-Laden to justice! Al-Queda is still active and plotting attacks on your country and mine!
Wasn't the last war about stopping them?

The rest of the world is not anti-american, but the US has definately lost the respect of some of the people who matter!
When the rest of the world asks America to be a team player and the US says 'up-yours' it doesn't make the rest of the world want to jump into line just because the US says it should.


I regard myself as pro-american, but I can see that the US needs to be more aware of the outside world.

France, Germany, Russia, are all important countries.
GW should get on a plane and try some shuttle diplomacy.
Instead his attitude is 'F**k you all, we'll go it alone'
Even implying that the opinions of the other great world powers is unimportant, just hardens their attitudes against his administration.

BTW, Tony Blair is supposed to be a Labour Prime Minister.
He acts like a Republican President.
He has betrayed us on fundamental manifesto promises. He is as far removed from being a socialist as Margaret Thatcher (Who incidentally ruined OUR reputation abroard).
He is so busy always looking for a 'third way' that wont piss anyone off, that he manages to never make a single damn decision.

I've always voted Labour.
But this guy should be dropped like a ton of hot shit.

<small>[ February 07, 2003, 05:39 PM: Message edited by: Metal Slug ]</small>
 

Bluevoodu

Kyokugen's Student
Joined
Aug 22, 2001
Posts
3,189
What has GW done that Clinton Didn't?

HE ACTUALLY IS DOING SOMETHING! Clinton sucked donkey. After he left office the economy started dying.. why? Many of the things he did and put into place started taking effect. See... when you pass an economic bill ..etc.. it takes about 5-7 years... and then you start to see the effect.... it DOES NOT happen over night.

Plus, the world we live in now has dramatically changed since Clinton has been there. It has only been a couple years, yes... but things have changed.. esp. with the World trade center bombings. That literally hit the WORLD... especially in the pocket book.

GW is doing a great job despite all he faces. That guy has a full plate, and my respect. The most Clinton did was play with a few cigars and ignored world threats... especially from Bin Laden....

†B†V†
 

rugal2000

, Troll Me, , Cuz I is 3lit3, ,
Joined
Aug 31, 2000
Posts
1,732
Im sorry i didnt mean to cause offence.......but G W is the leader and a country will be judged by the words and actions of its leaders. hell .........look at Iraq.
 

BIG

sony fanboy
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
7,205
Originally posted by BlackSpy:
You clearly have so little idea of what the EU is its almost funny.
Enlighten me,Wise One!
 

Bluevoodu

Kyokugen's Student
Joined
Aug 22, 2001
Posts
3,189
rugal2000:
Im sorry i didnt mean to cause offence.......but G W is the leader and a country will be judged by the words and actions of its leaders. hell .........look at Iraq.
no offense :)

GW is doing rather good... he is thefocal point of the world right now (basically).

thats got to be overwhelming stressfull :)

†B†V†
 

Phoenix Down

Flagstaff Up,
20 Year Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Posts
3,669
Bush has definitely not been perfect, I won't even try to argue that. But I still believe that he's trying to do what's in the best interests of the USA even if he's not as eloquent as some past leaders of this country. Yeah, I guess he sucks at foreign policy since he's not throwing away all of America's money at other countries like Slick Willie did.

A couple points:
1) Al-Qaeda, Saddam et al. started this war on Sept. 11, NOT us. Part of the reason we're interested in Iraq is because we believe they have ties to Bin Laden, etc. AND we think they are getting ready to execute another attack. Basically the idea would be to hit them before they hit us.

2) I've always disagreed with the USA's support of Israel. The Arabs are who we should have sided with years ago if anyone. So I can certainly understand that they're pissed off at us; I'd be pissed off too if another country sided with my mortal enemy. The only reason the government sides with Israel is that there are a bunch of Jews who have a lot of money in this country and unfortunately here money=power. We should have stayed the hell out of both sides' business. The Jews and Arabs have been fighting in that region for what, 3000+ years now? What makes everyone else think they want peace now? Besides the Israelis were doing the same shit to the Arabs 100 years ago that the Arabs are doing to the Israelis now. Unfortunately there's not much we can do about it now...

3) Evidence: Jesus Christ how much evidence do you need? What does the world want from us, a picture of Saddam next to a big-ass vat of anthrax with Bin Laden by his side??? I haven't looked at all the evidence myself but from what I've seen there's more than enough already.

4) Us-against-the-world: frankly we wouldn't be this way if we actually got some support once in a while from the U.N. Most people in America think the United Nations is a complete waste of time, and I agree. We give them money and support, but when we ask for help, like now with Iraq, all WE ever get is a big 'fuck-you' so you'll excuse us if we don't feel very good about the U.N.

Oh and one more thing: Bill Clinton is one of the WORST Presidents this country ever had. He had no dignity, he was useless in office except to spend all his time outside the states and he was the true definition of a hypocrite and a coward by sending troops to Bosnia, etc. even though he wouldn't go to serve his country. The only thing he deserved is a bullet to the head years ago for treason. The only thing I can take solace in is that he's no longer in power. frown
 
Top