New Final Fantasy: Square is retarded....

Daisuke Jigen

R.I.P.,, Dear Friend,
Joined
Sep 18, 2000
Posts
4,577
Taken from IGN.com:

"First up, the similarities. Aoki revealed that FF: CC features enemies, spells and story themes used in the Final Fantasy universe, along with a few characters such as Moogles and the same monsters. Aside from that, Square is taking the series in a new direction which strikes us as a bit of Phantasy Star Online and Secret of Mana.

As with PSO, FF: CC emphasizes multiplayer gameplay, although in this case gameplay is Offline with four players controlling the game through their individual controllers or Game Boy Advance units. You create a character from a set of character types, each with a number of variations. The game progresses with players defeating enemies and collecting keys to continue through locked areas.

From Aoki's comments, it seems that multiplayer is indeed being emphasized in this title. Attacking an enemy by yourself is fine and all, but it's better to team up against an enemy, and with proper timing you and your comrades can deal great damage. One example is in the use of an ice spell to freeze an enemy. Upon being frozen, another player comes in and strikes the enemy.

We're not sure at this point if the storyline of FF: CC will be as intricate as games in the main Final Fantasy series or as limited as in PSO. It has been revealed that town and event scenes will be in the game, although they weren't shown at the event, so we can't judge how robust they are.

Whatever the case, the background story that has been thus far revealed for the game works cleverly into actual gameplay. A party will always have an item called a "Crystal Cage" in its position. This item repels the effects of the death-inducing vapor that's covering the land, but its effects extend only so far. As you play, the border of a green-colored circle flashes off and on to make you aware of where the Crystal Cage loses effectiveness. Someone in your party must carry the Crystal Cage (carried over the character's head) as you advance through an area. Of course, when fighting enemies, the Crystal Cage can be placed on the ground so that all four players can do battle.
"


So its a multiplayer RPG...without online capabilities?

FUCK THAT
 

Kid Aphex

samus' love slave,
Joined
Nov 23, 2001
Posts
9,851
Originally posted by Daisuke Jigen:
<strong>Taken from IGN.com:


So its a multiplayer RPG...without online capabilities?

FUCK THAT</strong><hr></blockquote>

Did you think it was going to be online? It's always been offline monkey man.

This makes me happier...this might actually end up being fun. I like the crystal cage aspect...

Personally, i think baldurs gate on the PS2 was a GREAT multiplayer RPG without online capabilities. As long as FF:CC has items and gold to fight over...it might be sweeeet.
 

Daisuke Jigen

R.I.P.,, Dear Friend,
Joined
Sep 18, 2000
Posts
4,577
Originally posted by Kid Aphex:
<strong>

Did you think it was going to be online? It's always been offline monkey man.

This makes me happier...this might actually end up being fun. I like the crystal cage aspect...

Personally, i think baldurs gate on the PS2 was a GREAT multiplayer RPG without online capabilities. As long as FF:CC has items and gold to fight over...it might be sweeeet.</strong><hr></blockquote>

I think it is going to signifigantly shrink the audience by limiting multiplayer to offline.

I know I'm not buying it now.
 

Buro Destruct

Formerly known as, Buro Destruct, , Southtown Stre
Joined
Jul 27, 2002
Posts
9,058
The Crystal Cage concept (yay for alliteration) sounds interesting, although something similar might be more entertaining in an FPS or team-based online game (think Halo 2).

I'm still not wholly buying the offline multiplayer aspect. Guess we'll have to wait and see how it really handles.
 

Kid Aphex

samus' love slave,
Joined
Nov 23, 2001
Posts
9,851
Originally posted by Buro Destruct:
<strong>The Crystal Cage concept (yay for alliteration) sounds interesting, although something similar might be more entertaining in an FPS or team-based online game (think Halo 2).

I'm still not wholly buying the offline multiplayer aspect. Guess we'll have to wait and see how it really handles.</strong><hr></blockquote>

YOU didn't play Baldurs GATE did you fucker?
DID YOU!?

KROMLECH THE DWARF wanted all the fucking gold!!!
 

Emperor

New Challenger
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Posts
60
Square Enix can suck my dick. To me, they died right when they started making shit for PSX
 

Kid Aphex

samus' love slave,
Joined
Nov 23, 2001
Posts
9,851
Originally posted by Emperor:
<strong>Square Enix can suck my dick. To me, they died right when they started making shit for PSX</strong><hr></blockquote>

Final fantasy 7 had sex with your face for free.
 

k'_127

NeoGumby's Sycophant,
20 Year Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2002
Posts
6,724
Originally posted by Kid Aphex:
<strong>

Final fantasy 7 had sex with your face for free.</strong><hr></blockquote>

don't forget 9 and dragon warior 7 (now where is the US DW 4 remake :( )
 

rarehero

Rotterdam Nation Resident,
20 Year Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2001
Posts
13,454
eh.
never cared for final fantasy.
but quite honestly.
i do like the hack and slash formula.
if theres anything i dont like about rpgs, its random battle encounters.
but zelda kinda run and shank stuff is cool i thought.
i hope multi player isnt a neccessity..
because i rarely care for that.
if the cpu can control the other characters and you
could play that way. almost like the skeleton in guardian heros.
then yea. that ll be cool.
i do agree jig. an online one would be kinda cool.
hell. square whores it out for the ps2.
hope its worth it in the future.
 

marsteam

, Typey McTypes-a-Lot,
Joined
Jan 6, 2001
Posts
288
Originally posted by Buro Destruct:
<hr></blockquote>

Sorry offtopic, but 1st Scorpio then Reiko from R4 in your sigs?!? You sir, have good taste (ie similar tastes as mine)
 

dirtboy69

Zero's Secretary
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Posts
148
i heard sqaure was doing that but fuck with out actually net play what's the point?? it won't be like the others in the series the company goes bankrupt every time it puts a game completly relying on the sales for the game in question and when it flops it will be the end of square and the end of what was a good series before now
 

kernow

Superior Being
25 Year Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2001
Posts
38,831
having never played a final fantasy or square title I would have to say

'meh'
 

pac-man

Mr. Big's Thug
Joined
Oct 13, 2002
Posts
207
Well from what I read about FFX2 (LOL love that!). It's just like FFX. I can say atleast FF:CC has more of an origonality instead of trying to make Yuna look like a whore and try and make a story up that is decent. Meh yeah right.

They have crushed Yuna's structure of what she was. She looks like a different person in way.
Now that may not matter to you guys but to me as I want to be a director, I think it ruins it alot. <img src="graemlins/ohno.gif" border="0" alt="[Oh No]" />

Also not everyone cares alot about online multiplayer beleive it or not.

But I think FFXI looks very promising. FFXII from what I have seen (poster) looks like another FFVIII and to me that was the worst out of the series. <img src="graemlins/crying.gif" border="0" alt="[Crying]" />

[ January 05, 2003: Message edited by: pac-man ]</p>
 

FeelGood

So Many Posts
No Time
For Games.
Joined
Aug 18, 2001
Posts
17,794
Funny how I was thrilled about this game when it was announced, and now I'm not because Square is purposely trying to fuck it up.

Like they're trying to fuck up the FFT GBA - then they'll say "people don't like buying FF games on non-Sony hardware. So we will not make more games for non-Sony hardware." I can totally see it.
 

Galford Forever

Krizalids Fashion Designer
Joined
Feb 12, 2002
Posts
1,826
Originally posted by EvilWasabi:
<strong>Funny how I was thrilled about this game when it was announced, and now I'm not because Square is purposely trying to fuck it up.

Like they're trying to fuck up the FFT GBA - then they'll say "people don't like buying FF games on non-Sony hardware. So we will not make more games for non-Sony hardware." I can totally see it.</strong><hr></blockquote>

What are they doing to FFT on GBA? I'm sooooooo looking forward to this game!! What's wrong with it!!!!???? Oh please let it be good!!
 

FeelGood

So Many Posts
No Time
For Games.
Joined
Aug 18, 2001
Posts
17,794
Originally posted by Galford Forever:
<strong>

What are they doing to FFT on GBA? I'm sooooooo looking forward to this game!! What's wrong with it!!!!???? Oh please let it be good!!</strong><hr></blockquote>

<a href="http://www.the-magicbox.com/game122502d.htm" target="_blank">http://www.the-magicbox.com/game122502d.htm</a>

see the fucked up animal races? This kind of shit pisses me off. Ramza and Delita never had to deal with stupid mice and things that looked like green shit. Plus the idea of a law system is just stupid. They're overcomplicating something that was already perfect.

My belief is that Square had it right with Final Fantasy Tactics the first time. I might have been better on a cart system for load times, but that's it.

At least Onimusha tactics still looks good.
 

Robert

,
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2000
Posts
5,748
Final fantasy it consumes my life
and that's probably why
I'll never get a wife......
 

Galford Forever

Krizalids Fashion Designer
Joined
Feb 12, 2002
Posts
1,826
Originally posted by EvilWasabi:
<strong>

<a href="http://www.the-magicbox.com/game122502d.htm" target="_blank">http://www.the-magicbox.com/game122502d.htm</a>

see the fucked up animal races? This kind of shit pisses me off. Ramza and Delita never had to deal with stupid mice and things that looked like green shit. Plus the idea of a law system is just stupid. They're overcomplicating something that was already perfect.

My belief is that Square had it right with Final Fantasy Tactics the first time. I might have been better on a cart system for load times, but that's it.

At least Onimusha tactics still looks good.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Ah, I see what you mean. Although I'm not too sure that just having animal companions will ruin the game... even if I'm not exactly thrilled about it either.

What's this law system about? I hope it's not like the system in Ogre Battle 64. That law/chaos system completely ruined the game for me :( .
 

JHendrix

Jello Pudding Pop, Y'know? Like that whole Bill C
Joined
Jun 27, 2001
Posts
9,436
1.) If it was online they'd actually have to put out a BBA for the GameCube and I think we all know how impossibly hard that is to do.

2.) Square is scared shit of online games now cause of FF11.

3.) When you require add on hardware for online games they generally don't sell well. Read FF11 in Japan, and Socom here in the US (it sold moderately well but Live sales dwarfed it by comparison).

I still think it'll be pretty fun to play with people all around you playing on one big screen.

Peace

JHendrix
 

chainsawyak

Raiden's Valet
25 Year Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2000
Posts
1,121
Crystal Chronicles will suck because we all know how bad Secret of Mana was 2-Player............ :rolleyes:

;)
 

trunks218

Edo Express Delivery Guy
Joined
Dec 25, 2001
Posts
344
Sounds like more over hyped Gamecube crap. That system deserves at least one good game before it dies. Sense Nintendo can't make one or pay some one to make one for them, hopefully square won't drop the ball but I wouldn't hold my breath.
 

Plisken

Snaaaaaaake!,
Joined
Oct 14, 2002
Posts
3,494
SquareEnix sucks, drag-on dragoon can lick panzer dragoon's balls, the copycat muddyfunsters. Same way PSO will always own any online squaer crap.
 

Galford Forever

Krizalids Fashion Designer
Joined
Feb 12, 2002
Posts
1,826
Originally posted by trunks218:
<strong>Sounds like more over hyped Gamecube crap. That system deserves at least one good game before it dies. Sense Nintendo can't make one or pay some one to make one for them, hopefully square won't drop the ball but I wouldn't hold my breath.</strong><hr></blockquote>

<img src="graemlins/eek2.gif" border="0" alt="[Eek 2]" />
 
Top