Worst Movies 2001: Your picks

aria

Former Moderator
Joined
Dec 4, 1977
Posts
39,546
I'll be the first to admit that I pre-screen movies pretty heavily before I choose to see them, so I don't usually see a lot of bad movies anymore. Still there were disappointments and a few real turkeys out there this year.

Disappointments:

Down to Earth
Shrek
Made
Planet of the Apes
The Added Music in Apocalypse Now Redux
American Pie 2
The Curse of the Jade Scorpion

<IMG SRC="smilies/veryangry.gif" border="0"> TURKEYS: <IMG SRC="smilies/veryangry.gif" border="0">

Cats & Dogs - So, so, soo much potential wasted. Mr. Tinkles singularly kept this from being one of my worst movies of all time.

3000 Miles to Graceland - how can you mess up a movie with Elvis, Ice-T, and Howie Long that badly? It should have at least been goofy fun.

Spy Kids - I did not want to see it, was outvoted 4-3, just like the presidency.

[ January 09, 2002: Message edited by: Bobak ]
 
T

ThE HeAvEnLy KiNg' LoRd YaMaZaKi

Guest
Yea, that movie Spy Kids fucking sucks salty nuts... I almost puked in disgust when I saw that shit... Even my grandma threw a finger at the gay kids... That movie was disgusting, I tell ya... Disgusting.... He,He...
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2000
Posts
3,221
Scary Movie 2 was the worst movie I've ever seen. I liked the first.

B
 

marvelguy68

NEST Puppet
Joined
Apr 12, 2001
Posts
166
Forgot this movie in the other post

Hands down, the worst, and i mean the worst movie of 2001.

BABY BOY


NUFF SAID
 

FeelGood

So Many Posts
No Time
For Games.
Joined
Aug 18, 2001
Posts
17,794
America's Sweethearts!!!

Sucked the fart from ass


D06393l.jpg
 

John

Ghost of Captain Kidd
Joined
Jun 13, 2001
Posts
1,665
Final Fantasy
Battlefield Earth (yeah, I know technically it's 2000, but I think it deserves to be the worst movie every year. It's not even particularly good propaganda--L. Ron Hubbard's brain must be rolling in its robotic battle body <IMG SRC="smilies/tongue.gif" border="0">)

Planet of the Apes (What the bloody fuck were they thinking with that moronic ending?)
 

rarehero

Rotterdam Nation Resident,
20 Year Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2001
Posts
13,454
Originally posted by Bobak:
<STRONG>3000 Miles to Graceland - how can you mess up a movie with Elvis, Ice-T, and Howie Long that badly? It should have at least been goofy fun.
</STRONG>

really?
i was hoping this was good too.
was thinking about picking it up on dvd.
i agree its hard to ruin a movie with elvis in it.
it must be pretty bad then..
 
C

Caris Nautilus

Guest
Originally posted by John:
<STRONG>Planet of the Apes (What the bloody fuck were they thinking with that moronic ending?)</STRONG>

POTA's ruled, why is the ending moronoic? Because you can't easily understand or process it? After I saw the ending I was like holy shit that was fucked up! (in a good way), and was a little "That was impossible though! What the fuck?"

Here is a very well written guide to understanding the ending I found on the net, after you read this, and watch the movie AGAIN, you'll probably understand the ending a lot more (like I did, and now I think it's kick ass):

"In short, the POTA is NOT Earth!!! Leo screwed up AGAIN by allowing Thade to live. The general now has access to the Oberion's databanks that gives him great knowledge concerning the humans and earth. He also knows Leo's pod crashed in the swamp and now has a chimp pilot who can either teach him how to fly the pod or he may just have Pericles fly the pod for him back to earth. He arrives before Leo (last in, first out) -- perhaps 100's of years prior -- and leads the earth apes in rebellion (just like Caesar in Conquest of the Planet of the Apes) as well as merging his own enhanced DNA into the simian population. The apes win, just as they did on the POTA, and the Lincoln Memorial is made/altered in honor of the ape's new leader.

Alternately, if you don't buy the idea of Thade repairing Leo's pod, there is another explaination. If you watch the beginning of the movie closely, you will notice there are many pods on the Oberion as evidenced by the many pod bay doors on the ship (two rows of door along the entire inside of the ring); so it is possible that he finds another working pod somewhere on the planet (one of the many pods possibly launched before the Oberion crashed) and flies that pod back to earth.

Personally, I loved the ending... which is the same ending as the original novel and was the ending in the original screenplay of the 1968 version (the POTA didn't become earth until about the 2nd revision and the Lady Liberty element wasn't added until about the 4th revision of the script). Back in 1977, I made a Planet of the Apes movie on Super8 film with a bunch of high school friends that followed the book more closely (except we kept the movie's costumes and makeup) that ended like the book ...and very similar to the Burton ending."


Adding to this, Thade was a decendant of CMOS, the ape that rised up against the humans on the POTAs and won the FIRST time, so it's in his blood.

That's the best ending they could have picked IMO, to use the exact same ending as the first POTAs movie would have been a huge waste, whats the fun in knowing how somethings gonna end? Or they could have ended it as soon as his pod went back into the space storm, letting you decide what could have happened, but that would have pissed me off a lot, cause it's kinda a cop-out (it also would have made them look like they didn't have a "real" ending).

BTW Spy Kids was a cool movie, it was just a kid movie, if you don't like kid movies, of course your going to think it sucks. If they made an "As the world turns" movie, to me it'd be the worst movie of all time.

BTW movie reviews are as pointless as music reviews, because everyone has different tastes, and last time I checked you don't have to go to colledge to do either professions.

Most professional music and movie reviewers are people who couldn't break into the actual movie/music industry, so their disgruntled and most of the time tear down the people who actually were good enough to make it. Kind of like authors who can't get published taking jobs at Universitys teaching english.

If you actually buy movies or music based on just reviews, you'll have a very boring collection.

This is not directed at anyone in this thread, I just really hate all music/movie reviews in magazines and on TV. Fan reviews (like these) are fine, because fans ushually have nothing to gain by praising or trashing a movie, so they would actually be better to listen to than the "real" reviewers.

3000 Miles to Graceland - how can you mess up a movie with Elvis, Ice-T, and Howie Long that badly? It should have at least been goofy fun.

I liked this movie, it wasnt the greatest though, because it dragged on a bit to much, and the storyline kinda got lost in some parts. The joke about "Whats the best thing about dating a homeless girl" was funny though. And the "You want a peanut butter and jelly sandwich?" "hell yea".

[ January 10, 2002: Message edited by: Drift King EX ]
 

aria

Former Moderator
Joined
Dec 4, 1977
Posts
39,546
Originally posted by Rade Kuruc:
<STRONG>Pearl Harbour. So bad.</STRONG>

That wasn't on my list because I skipped it all together <IMG SRC="smilies/smile.gif" border="0">

like Glitter <IMG SRC="smilies/biggrin.gif" border="0">

It's funny how Vanilla Sky is really divided into the "liked vs hated" camps. Reminds me of A.I.

Incidently, my problem with Planet of the Apes wasn't the ending, but the first half of the movie. Nothing felt right. The sets felt too much like sets. I guess I was expecting more believable "fantasy" imagery from Burton.

[ January 10, 2002: Message edited by: Bobak ]
 

Takumaji

Krautmin
Staff member
Joined
Jul 24, 2001
Posts
20,462
The biggest dissapointment for me was Apocalypse Now Redux. It's a shame that Coppola agreed to release it. The original movie is a true visual and aural masterpiece, which can only get worse if it gets re-touched.

But hey, this goes for nearly any "director's cut". Remember Alien II? It was Cameron at its best, with nearly the same depressing atmosphere than Ridley Scott's legendary first part, but they ruined it with a shitload of stupid additional action scenes.
 
C

Caris Nautilus

Guest
Originally posted by Takumaji:
<STRONG>The biggest dissapointment for me was Apocalypse Now Redux. It's a shame that Coppola agreed to release it. The original movie is a true visual and aural masterpiece, which can only get worse if it gets re-touched.

But hey, this goes for nearly any "director's cut". Remember Alien II? It was Cameron at its best, with nearly the same depressing atmosphere than Ridley Scott's legendary first part, but they ruined it with a shitload of stupid additional action scenes.</STRONG>

Your talking about the Aliens DVD cut? With the 18 minutes of scenes in it I think.

It was awesome, it set up the begining of the movie much better, actually showing what happened a little to the colony before the marines got there. If you read the Dark Horse comic "Newts Tale" it's pretty much the directors cut. Not to mention it was only in the first 45 mins of the movie about, all it showed was more scenes with the marines before they got there, and the colony before.

Better setup for the movie if you ask me.

If you wanna talk about a bad directors cut, see the Night of the Living Dead 20th Ann. ediiton, total shit. They actually shot NEW footage with actors, and mixed it with cut scenes from the original. So they drag the ending on an extra 8 minutes with this lame clinic scene with this reverend guy talking with a nurse (the nurse is new footage from 1998 or whenever it was released).

[ January 10, 2002: Message edited by: Drift King EX ]
 

Late

Reichsf?rer-Finnland,
20 Year Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2001
Posts
8,348
Lord of the Rings part 1
Why mess with a good thing?
 
Joined
Oct 3, 2001
Posts
3,583
--Fast and the Furious--
Point Break on hot wheels, minus the star power, beautiful cinematography, and James Cameron screenplay. C'mon, this will not be remembered in the future as one of the greats. You might think it's 'cool' now if you're a teenager, but in 10 yrs. you'll realize what a ridiculous pile a crap it is.

--Scary Movie 2--

The Wayans blew their wad in the first 5 minutes of the film. That first scene, the Excorsist one, is the best scene in the movie. Leaving you sitting there bored out of your mind for the next 80 minutes. At the same time thinking to yourself "how the hell can the Wayans make this bad of a movie?" Well, it happened, and it happened in force.

--BabyBoy--

Another movie marketed towards the whole teenage crowd, not to rag on teenagers, I was a teen only 7 yrs ago, but it's so damn obvious to see which movies are geared for the teen audience. Here, watch what it's like livin in da hood, again. Director John Singleton, along with Spike Lee and the Hughes Brothers (MEnace II society) can blow me. I'm thru with these black struggle, growin up in da hood films. We get the point already, however ridicuolous your point is, we get it alright?
 

Robert

,
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2000
Posts
5,748
fast and furious must be take as a document on the wild races and on the tuning in general. If you like that , the movie is great. If you don't...
 

Takumaji

Krautmin
Staff member
Joined
Jul 24, 2001
Posts
20,462
Originally posted by Drift King EX:
<STRONG>Your talking about the Aliens DVD cut? With the 18 minutes of scenes in it I think.

It was awesome, it set up the begining of the movie much better, actually showing what happened a little to the colony before the marines got there. If you read the Dark Horse comic "Newts Tale" it's pretty much the directors cut. Not to mention it was only in the first 45 mins of the movie about, all it showed was more scenes with the marines before they got there, and the colony before.

Better setup for the movie if you ask me. [...] </STRONG>

The new scenes with Newt's family and how they discovered the alien ship are a problem for me. IMO they destroy the eerie, frightful and *silent* atmosphere (the silence of death, like in the first part). I prefer the original cut, where the audience gets told about LV24-6 (the colony) and its alien problem during the first conversatin of Burke and Ripley. Plot-wise, this is a much better construction, which sends shivers down your spine, but the new version just shows the family, Newt, the alien ship, and anyone who has seen part one knows what happens - attack of the face huggers. It was justified that Dan O'Bannion (editor/producer) didn't want to include these scenes in the first version.

When Aliens II came out, I was still impressed by the first part, and I was even more happy that Cameron did *not* make a pure action movie out of it. The additional scenes do the movie no good.

I agree with you that the movie setup is better for someone who has not seen Aliens II before, but not for a guy like me who watched the movie 14 times in the cinema, and prolly 100 times on video.

Sorry for the long rant - Aliens I and II are my fav SciFi horror movies. Parts 3 + 4 are no Alien anymore, just ridiculous, CGI-based monster films.

[edit: added some Aliens 3+4 insults]

[ January 10, 2002: Message edited by: Takumaji ]
 
C

Caris Nautilus

Guest
Originally posted by Takumaji:
<STRONG>[edit: added some Aliens 3+4 insults]</STRONG>

I liked Alien 3, and I also liked Alien 4, but I seperate the first 3 films and the 4th.

3 was the end of the Trilogy, to me 4 is a seperate film from those 3, since it really has nothing to do with any of them except the aliens and riply are in it.

When 3 first came out though I was a bit pissed they killed off Hicks, Newt I can see, because they couldn't have used the same girl (she grew up), but the reason I liekd the 2nd one so much, was cause of all the guns and marines, and I didn't like the 1st or 3rd as much as the 2nd, cause there was only one alien (except for the awesome part in the alien ship in the first film).

So when the 4th came out and I knew there was more than 1 alien, I was excited about that seeing that.

The comics were really cool though, the 1-6 "Aliens" 2nd series from Dark Horse would have been an Alternate 3rd movie I wouldn't mind seeing (it was also released years before the 3rd film).

Instead of them crashing on the prison planet and killing off Newt and Hicks, their ship was picked up in Hyper Sleep by the company (trying to get alien samples from them), and the story continues from there, although riply isn't in that whole series till the last page of the 6th comic (but it continues in the next series Earth War), so I don't know how the box office draw would have been with no riply.

It was still awesome though.

[ January 10, 2002: Message edited by: Drift King EX ]
 

Takumaji

Krautmin
Staff member
Joined
Jul 24, 2001
Posts
20,462
Originally posted by Drift King EX:
<STRONG>I liked Alien 3, and I also liked Alien 4, but I seperate the first 3 films and the 4th.

3 was the end of the Trilogy, to me 4 is a seperate film from those 3, since it really has nothing to do with any of them except the aliens and riply are in it.

When 3 first came out though I was a bit pissed they killed off Hicks, Newt I can see, because they couldn't have used the same girl (she grew up), but the reason I liekd the 2nd one so much, was cause of all the guns and marines, and I didn't like the 1st or 3rd as much as the 2nd, cause there was only one alien (except for the awesome part in the alien ship in the first film).

So when the 4th came out and I knew there was more than 1 alien, I was excited about that seeing that. [...] </STRONG>

Hmm...

Okay, IMO 3 was bad compared to 1 or 2, but not that bad compared to 4.

3 has some nice visuals, and also the concept of that con planet/moon is plausible, but the alien chase scenes simply do not fit. They fit in terms of the story, because the basically "evil" inmates finally join together and fight in a team against the beasts, but it's all too bright, too clean. And the ending where Ripley jumps into the hot iron is just pathetic IMO, but again, it kinda fits.

But 4... A combination of fears of genetic engineering and doubtful creature effects. The scene where the monster eats the head of that scientist really made me laugh (I was the only one in the cinema who laughed, but... yknow...).
 

GregN

aka The Grinch
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2000
Posts
17,580
Fast And the Furious - This one is for adrenaline junkie car nerds. Hyped and overinflated. A disposable teen movie. If you want this kind of action, go out on the highways of LA, San Fran, or DC and do it all yourself. Or play Tokyo Extreme Racer Zero, 1, or 2.

Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within - Felt too much like Starship troopers to me with the big alien things. PPL that haven't played the games will like it, as it doesn't follow any of the games whatsoever. This is a film that proves that hype, and money don't always equal popularity.
 
Top