dependzbarmitzfa
n00b

- Joined
- Jan 8, 2002
- Posts
- 12
well are you ?
Originally posted by Takumaji:
<STRONG>'course I am.
A shade once ripped me off, that's why I usually don't bid on auctions of these dudes. I haven't lost too much money, but it sucks anyway.
Keep your eyes open.</STRONG>
Originally posted by Takumaji:
<STRONG>Yeah, you bet, Daisuke!
Sometimes it may be unfair not to deal with shades, but I had no positive deals with them so far.
I once placed a bit on a record and won the auction, sent the money and waited, but nothing. I complained, wrote mails, nothing. Finally, eBay told me that the seller was obviously a thief (what lucid conclusion), and that was that.</STRONG>
Originally posted by buster_reppu-ken:
<STRONG>
Everybodu who joins ebay has shades for the first month (i think), hell i had them but now i have 64 positives with no neutrals or negatives</STRONG>
I agree and its a good way to look at things, but what i meant was if nobody trusted me i wouldnt have shades anymore but i would be sitting at zero.Originally posted by Blaine:
<STRONG>............everybody has them. You said so yourself. What's your current status have to do with that?
It's not like everyone who has shades turns out to be a law-abiding citizen <IMG SRC="smilies/smile.gif" border="0">.
Sure you did, but remember that dude last Xmas who ripped people off for like $25,000? He also had shades.
I'm leary of shades because they haven't been around long at all.
If they have like 3 feedback, no negs, and they bought something significant (not like all $1 purchases) than I'd let them slide on most things.
I suspect everything is a trap...which is why I'm still alive.</STRONG>
Originally posted by djbomberman:
<STRONG>We all had to start with shades didn't we? Unless a shades person has bid retractions/negative feedback, I give them the benifit of the doubt. [...] </STRONG>
I once placed a bit on a record and won the auction, sent the money and waited, but nothing. I complained, wrote mails, nothing. Finally, eBay told me that the seller was obviously a thief (what lucid conclusion), and that was that.