- Joined
- Aug 20, 2000
- Posts
- 60,434
damn.
i had just gotten my game cube a few days ago and hadnt played anything in that time except for animal crossing.
today feeling kind of bored, i decided to give my dreamcast some lovin, since i hadnt played it in oh, 3 days.
so i pop in sonic adventure 2. and thats when i almost started to cry.
i was still amazed by the graphics, and the rich textures, and uber fast speed of the game. thinking how it looks better than almost every single ps2 game, and even some xbox and gc games. and definately plays better than the lot of em (sonic and shadow levels anyway.)
then i started thinking about the ign.cube review of sa2:battle. how they bashed the game so hard, because they said it looked just like the dreamcast version which according to the means shit.
i still cant possibly concieve how dreamcast failed even in the graphics driven whore market of today.
sonic adventure 2 is one madd impressive graphic fest.
i still cant fathom what happened...
i had just gotten my game cube a few days ago and hadnt played anything in that time except for animal crossing.
today feeling kind of bored, i decided to give my dreamcast some lovin, since i hadnt played it in oh, 3 days.
so i pop in sonic adventure 2. and thats when i almost started to cry.
i was still amazed by the graphics, and the rich textures, and uber fast speed of the game. thinking how it looks better than almost every single ps2 game, and even some xbox and gc games. and definately plays better than the lot of em (sonic and shadow levels anyway.)
then i started thinking about the ign.cube review of sa2:battle. how they bashed the game so hard, because they said it looked just like the dreamcast version which according to the means shit.
i still cant possibly concieve how dreamcast failed even in the graphics driven whore market of today.
sonic adventure 2 is one madd impressive graphic fest.
i still cant fathom what happened...
