ShmengeTravel
Mature's Make-up Artist
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2003
- Posts
- 1,372
I mean really, Sega had this huge lineup behind Naomi, now it has this kick ass Lindbergh hardware, and everyone suddenly jumps ship to Type X? KOFX2, SF4...
What's the deal with Lindbergh?
- Thread starter ShmengeTravel
- Start date
Mature's Make-up Artist
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2005
- Posts
- 1,914
That's because...
-supporters-
Type X2:
ARC System Works
Atlus
Arika
AlphaSytem
Capcom
SNK Playmore
X-nauts/Psykyo
Success
sKonec
Taito
Takumi
Mitchell
Moss
Warashi
Lindbergh:
Sega
Taken from an old thread. i'm not sure if that's how it currently is, but I don't think many companies have supported the lindbergh system for some reason.
-supporters-
Type X2:
ARC System Works
Atlus
Arika
AlphaSytem
Capcom
SNK Playmore
X-nauts/Psykyo
Success
sKonec
Taito
Takumi
Mitchell
Moss
Warashi
Lindbergh:
Sega
Taken from an old thread. i'm not sure if that's how it currently is, but I don't think many companies have supported the lindbergh system for some reason.
Last edited:
ShmengeTravel
Mature's Make-up Artist
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2003
- Posts
- 1,372
I mean, I think I can understand. Lindbergh is a super powerful system, and games like SF4 and KOFX2 don't exactly need all that horsepower. So when it came time to choose a system to license it to, they went with the cheaper one. That's just my assumption, tho.
Verythrax
OWES ROT MONEY!
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2003
- Posts
- 4,553
Well, Type X have the familiar-to-develop factor from the Windows' directx.
I don't know if lindberg uses directx, being a PC based hardware, too.
And I'm not sure if Sega wanted lindbergh to be marketed as a multi-company platform like naomi was.
I don't know if lindberg uses directx, being a PC based hardware, too.
And I'm not sure if Sega wanted lindbergh to be marketed as a multi-company platform like naomi was.
