Fakk2 said:
Ooooh I didnt know an extra $100 would be bothersome for NeoGeo owners, lol, hmmm twice the performance on games and something that KILLS DVDs totally (BluRay) and only $100 dollars more, plus the BEST Exclusive titles to boot, man the PS3 is simply better in every aspect and if you decide 360 over it, your just a lame fanboy of shitty ass American JUNK! HD-DVD, pfff dont make me laugh. So in other words your stuck with DVD9 games for the next 4 years and your happy about that? LOL! please...... 360 owners are such damn fools. Remember the Dreamcast? Remember its fate? Everyone (Including myself) bought one for its superior graphics, its cheaper price, its smaller design, etc... and when the PS2 came out it was shit city for us DC owners. Same thing will happen to 360 now that it doesnt have "The power of X" under the hood, now its just a wimpy ass little baby and its gonna get blown away by the "Power of the PS3", lol.
First off, HD DVD currently is killing Blu Ray in sales. Go look it up.
Second, you inherently contradict yourself several times in this paragraph. Please make up your mind on whether superior specs make a system or break a system.
Third, DVD format was already well established during the release time of the PS2, and it was one of a kind. Blu Ray and HD DVD are still in their infancy stages so it's a HUGE risk on Sony's part to integrate the blu-ray drive into the PS3. Whereas if the HD-DVD flops, 360 owners aren't stuck with a $600 worthless pile of metal and plastic. They can still use their machine for its initial purpose, and that's to play its games.
It also falls back on developers too. Most of them are saying development for PS3 is way too costly. Sure there wil be some exclusives, but the majority of games both systems will share. Companies won't go out of their way to graphically enhance something significantly for the PS3 just because of the capability of the system. XBOX's superiority in specs didn't guarantee similar better looking games than the PS2. What makes you think that PS3 will change developers minds and force them to put in more money to a PS3 counterpart of a game they intend to make for both systems?
But most of all, it ultimately falls back on the consumer. Whether you like it or not, just like with the XBOX and the PS2, they will both be getting the same games. And then it falls back on the consumer whether they want to pay $50 or $70 for the same game.
Only a $100 extra and you get a better system, just remember that, oh but lets not forget the dumbass fanboy remarks "But its got Halo!!!!" and your answer is "Yup, so will the PC, so it is NOT exclusive!" and the PC version has more content (Halo 1 on the PC had Online Features for example) so all in all everyone has thier own opinions about it, and mine is 360 is a joke, and on Nov. 15th everyone will find out why.
Oh god, I just remembered 360 doesnt even have HDMI, it uses Component still , EEEwwwwww... Who the hell wants to look at that washed out looking garbage when they can finally view HD games in NextGen HDMI!?
360 is developing to be more than just a halo box. Its state-of-the-art online play is what makes it shine now and right now, this is whats
Its great to see you have so much enthusiasm in the PS3's release. Just don't let your fanboyism blind you. A true fan of any given company will be more than happy to correct said company if they make mistakes. A fanboy cheers them on regardless what the potential/actual outcome is.