genjiglove said:Fact: I don't care about HD.
DashK said:you must be poor then. and therefor don't deserve an opinion.
thx
kobylka68 said:I have an hdtv but I will still pick up a revolution. For a wesbite dedicated to a low resolution 24 bit system, there sure are a lot of people more concerned with graphics rather than the actual games.
Mushiki said:This whole argument is taking place in some other thread already, but saying people shouldn't care about graphic quality in a forum where almost everyone has a S-Video/Component modded AES or loves RGB monitors is simply laughable.
genjiglove said:Think you could hook me up with a job at Subway?
kobylka68 said:What I find laughable is how everyone just simply rips into the system and it's abilities when you haven't even seen anything from it. Not a single game, demo or any hardware specs.
DevilRedeemed said:Nintendo tactics.
part 1:
less is more.
they did this with the DS and it payed off. coming clean is the new formula to winning people over. it contrasts directly with Sony's and MS' tactic of hype.
Nintendo hype through inuendo (calling the system Revolution etc.) rather than popping out figures. people are badly bloated with the amounts of figures thrown about for the last few years. it wasn't so much about that in the past.
Nintendo know this. they have their cool shades on. they say less is more, enjoy the ride, whilst the other companies are telling you, take the red pill and fucking spazz out to our technotrip.
and it works. and it will work. I'm not sold on the downloading games feature. but I am on the attitude.
Nintendo will be just fine. I wish I where saying this about Sega but oh well. atleast one old school company is still fighting.
take the red pill and fucking spazz out to our technotrip.
Mushiki said:We know something - it won't display games in HD.
Compare this to how the Xbox360 will display on 720p and the PlayStation3 on 1080p and you can already assume it won't compete from a technical standpoint. Even Nintendo has made it clear that they aren't going to deliver the most powerful system.
It "works", but sounds more like a survival tactic than anything else. They can't aim to have the first place, and they know it.
Fighting against giants like Sony and Microsoft must be a really hard task.
Mushiki said:We know something - it won't display games in HD.
Compare this to how the Xbox360 will display on 720p and the PlayStation3 on 1080p and you can already assume it won't compete from a technical standpoint. Even Nintendo has made it clear that they aren't going to deliver the most powerful system.
The specifications, which appeared on blog site Nintendo Centrium, suggest that the system will be powered by two 1.8Ghz IBM PowerPC G5 processors, a 600Mhz graphics chip from ATI and a 7.1 Digital Sound chipset.
The console will apparently sport 128MB of high speed 1T SRAM as main memory, along with 256MB of slower DRAM, while the graphics chip has 12MB of on-board high speed RAM. 6GB proprietary DVD-size discs, designed by Panasonic, would be used for Revolution's games.
DevilRedeemed said:Nintendo tactics.
part 1:
less is more.
they did this with the DS and it payed off. coming clean is the new formula to winning people over. it contrasts directly with Sony's and MS' tactic of hype.
Nintendo hype through inuendo (calling the system Revolution etc.) rather than popping out figures. people are badly bloated with the amounts of figures thrown about for the last few years. it wasn't so much about that in the past.
Nintendo know this. they have their cool shades on. they say less is more, enjoy the ride, whilst the other companies are telling you, take the red pill and fucking spazz out to our technotrip.
and it works. and it will work. I'm not sold on the downloading games feature. but I am on the attitude.
Nintendo will be just fine. I wish I where saying this about Sega but oh well. atleast one old school company is still fighting.
jethrek said:I gotta be honest, there's no reason a system with LESSER capabilities can't be HD compatible. This doesn't do jack shit for dev time, and honestly the extra port for an expensive HDTV add on for the system is about 50 cents for them to add (more important than that second Gamecube memory slot port on it)
But...they have a year to change their mind...
GiLL said:Don't let the other members of the Card-Carrying-Nintendo-Fanboy-Club hear you say this.
They hate any sort of logic or reason.