Nesagwa said:You know, Im studying game design and I should care about this.
JHendrix said:On a side note, anyone notice how IBM is making the chips for both the PS3 and XBox2? There are similarities between the Cell CPU and IBM’s next gen PPC cores, which may be why you always hear EA and other devs talk about PS3 & XBox2 and are leaving the Revolution out of their discussions, probably because the two units will be similar to program for.
Conspiracy theory: Wonder if that was done on purpose to further push devs away from Nintendo.
Mushiki said:As far as I know, both PlayStation3 and Xbox2 devkits are already available or almost available, while there are not even specs on the next Nintendo system.
In other words, maybe EA is working with what they know about and doesn't want to speculate that much.
JHendrix said:Their dev kits aren't anything like what the systems are going to be like.
JHendrix said:All we know for sure is that both systems will be PPC based, though the PS3 looks like it'll be more a divergence from the PPC standard than the XBox2 will be. I don't think that Sony got production Cell systems out to dev's yet, as far as I knew the fabs weren't ready yet.
Mushiki said:Obviously, but having beta devkits is much better than a blank spec-sheet.
Yes, Microsoft will go for the off-the-shelf-but-slightly-modified hardware once more. While Sony is taking a different approach. Not as custom as in the past (EE/GS), but still not standard PC hardware.
Other than that, we can also speculate on which GPU derivates both systems will most likely have.

JHendrix said:Well yar, but I'm sure Nintendo has put out some early dev kits or maybe not and they're going to be late again despite what they've said previously.
JHendrix said:As far as MS going the traditional role, I thought that it was not clear they were going with standard 940FX (aka G5) IBM chips but might be going with another one of their PPC cores. I doubt it'd be cell though, but nothing's been officially announce yet, at least that I've seen. If you've got a link then please feel free to share.![]()
Baseley09 said:Load of shit, pls show me the games.
Ditto. Where are the pretty looking tech demos already?Loopz said:.utterly boring thread

DashK said:Grow a dick and suck it Mushiki, thx.
JHendrix said:On a side note, anyone notice how IBM is making the chips for both the PS3 and XBox2? There are similarities between the Cell CPU and IBM’s next gen PPC cores, which may be why you always hear EA and other devs talk about PS3 & XBox2 and are leaving the Revolution out of their discussions, probably because the two units will be similar to program for.
Conspiracy theory: Wonder if that was done on purpose to further push devs away from Nintendo.
Iwata also let the audience peer into the guts of the Revolution, which he more elegantly referred to as the device's "technological heart." Like the next Xbox,[highlight] it will be powered by a custom central processor from IBM[/highlight], in this case code-named "Broadway." It will also sport a graphics card--code-named "Hollywood"--from ATI, which is also making the GPU for the next Xbox. “We’re excited to be developing the graphics chip set for Revolution, which continues our longstanding relationship with Nintendo,” said ATI president and CEO Dave Orton in a statement.
JHendrix said:Their dev kits aren't anything like what the systems are going to be like.
The XBox2 dev kits were G5's with 9800 Pro's in them, running a special kernel written by MS.
All we know for sure is that both systems will be PPC based, though the PS3 looks like it'll be more a divergence from the PPC standard than the XBox2 will be. I don't think that Sony got production Cell systems out to dev's yet, as far as I knew the fabs weren't ready yet.