Wal-Mart sex assault.

RAINBOW PONY

DASH DARK ANDY K,
20 Year Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2002
Posts
24,310
you don't know how many times i've been in walmart and wanted to shag some tasty MILF bitch i saw right there in the toy aisle, god bless this man for living my dream.....
 

Mike Shagohod

Stray Dog Grunt
20 Year Member
Joined
May 16, 2002
Posts
13,947
So let me get this straight... the dude basically followed her around fondling his dick & balls in what should have been caught on GOD's Eye {the security cameras above}, and no one else noticed this, and only after he jizzed on her did she realize he'd used her to mastrubate to??? While I realize being the unknowing target of a Ejaculation Bullseye is quite nasty to think about, how does this constitute as an actual physical assault?

I know it's semantics but I'm really curious as to how it's considered as such. Maybe resident lawyer BOBAK can shed some light on this for me. I mean even the contents of the story seem a bit odd. *She didn't notice until she felt his privates on her and realized what he was doing? OR... she realized that he had used her to gratify himself? WHICH ONE IS IT???

Did he hump her leg like a dog and then nut, or did he nut on her and when she felt a sticky liquid based substance after brushing into her did she yell assault? The fact that the guy was already a sex offender of course doesn't help his situation any, but which story is correct? Either way it's nasty.

MERCENARY X99
 

Big Shady

Kyukyogenryu Black Belt
15 Year Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2003
Posts
4,945
Mercenary X99 said:
So let me get this straight... the dude basically followed her around fondling his dick & balls in what should have been caught on GOD's Eye {the security cameras above}, and no one else noticed this, and only after he jizzed on her did she realize he'd used her to mastrubate to??? While I realize being the unknowing target of a Ejaculation Bullseye is quite nasty to think about, how does this constitute as an actual physical assault?

I know it's semantics but I'm really curious as to how it's considered as such. Maybe resident lawyer BOBAK can shed some light on this for me. I mean even the contents of the story seem a bit odd. *She didn't notice until she felt his privates on her and realized what he was doing? OR... she realized that he had used her to gratify himself? WHICH ONE IS IT???

Did he hump her leg like a dog and then nut, or did he nut on her and when she felt a sticky liquid based substance after brushing into her did she yell assault? The fact that the guy was already a sex offender of course doesn't help his situation any, but which story is correct? Either way it's nasty.

MERCENARY X99
Merc I think he just placed his twig and berries on her, no jizzim I'm afraid.
 

barf

Maxima's Barber
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
2,366
Big Shady said:
Merc I think he just placed his twig and berries on her, no jizzim I'm afraid.

happens all the time in subway i guess only with trousers between the 2.

first degree sexual assault ? i hope that s the smallest

he just came on her and she didn t even notice... in here he would have a hundred euro for public exhibitionism/trouble to public order and a 1 euro damage and interest fee for the woman. well in fact, in here the woman would even not have put the thing to the tribunal, just a good kick in his nuts.
 

soopafamicom

Windjammers Wonder
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
1,375
Mercenary X99 said:
So let me get this straight... the dude basically followed her around fondling his dick & balls in what should have been caught on GOD's Eye {the security cameras above}, and no one else noticed this, and only after he jizzed on her did she realize he'd used her to mastrubate to??? While I realize being the unknowing target of a Ejaculation Bullseye is quite nasty to think about, how does this constitute as an actual physical assault?

I know it's semantics but I'm really curious as to how it's considered as such. Maybe resident lawyer BOBAK can shed some light on this for me. I mean even the contents of the story seem a bit odd. *She didn't notice until she felt his privates on her and realized what he was doing? OR... she realized that he had used her to gratify himself? WHICH ONE IS IT???

Did he hump her leg like a dog and then nut, or did he nut on her and when she felt a sticky liquid based substance after brushing into her did she yell assault? The fact that the guy was already a sex offender of course doesn't help his situation any, but which story is correct? Either way it's nasty.

MERCENARY X99

semantics = sementricks :kekeke:
 

Tacitus

Volatile Memory Construct - SN://0467839
Staff member
Joined
Apr 26, 2002
Posts
15,120
Wow, how can you reply to a story this hot? :eek_2:
 

punkGuyta

Hardened Shock Trooper
Joined
Nov 19, 2003
Posts
444
Mercenary X99 said:
So let me get this straight... the dude basically followed her around fondling his dick & balls in what should have been caught on GOD's Eye {the security cameras above}, and no one else noticed this, and only after he jizzed on her did she realize he'd used her to mastrubate to??? While I realize being the unknowing target of a Ejaculation Bullseye is quite nasty to think about, how does this constitute as an actual physical assault?

I know it's semantics but I'm really curious as to how it's considered as such. Maybe resident lawyer BOBAK can shed some light on this for me. I mean even the contents of the story seem a bit odd. *She didn't notice until she felt his privates on her and realized what he was doing? OR... she realized that he had used her to gratify himself? WHICH ONE IS IT???

Did he hump her leg like a dog and then nut, or did he nut on her and when she felt a sticky liquid based substance after brushing into her did she yell assault? The fact that the guy was already a sex offender of course doesn't help his situation any, but which story is correct? Either way it's nasty.

MERCENARY X99

wow that post was alomost if not longer then the story
 
Top