
....english?
Yes I speak english , I guess I typed to fast for you to understand . If people dont mind listening to a shitty mp3 on a real stereo , because its free then I feel sorry for them. Its not even cd quality .
Absolutelly wrong. You have to get an amp/reciever that has analog 5.1 imputs. You are also going to need a decent, mid-line speaker set up. A competant soundsystem sound system will run you $1000-$1500.
Yeah maybe if it was currently the year 1999 . I got a pioneer amp vsx-db11s for around $400 2 years ago I think from circuit city it has dts 6.1 or 7.1 dont remember and when I play a sacd or dvd-a on it , it tells me what khz its currently running at the default signal and speaker specs . I can clearley tell a difference on this amp between the new formats and old cd's .
Agan, WRONG: SACD is actually a DVD in reality. Just take a look at the bottom of one if you get a chance. They BOTH play in DVD players. So many people here try to get into high end aspects of a particullar market and do so while being the biggest cheapasses. If you want to go that rout (and if you must be a best buy bitch) then go DVDA cause as toddy explained you won't notice the difference between the two with lower quallity set ups. Get SACD if you are truly seriouse about it and will drop a bit of coin on your equipment.
Agan im wrong ? I am truly seriose about it though.
Last sacd I had wouldnt play in any of my 5 dvd players so I dont know what your smoking .
I guess ill go that rout
All im saying is that moores law applies to stereos as well, and some things have changed since you worked at the audio video department at JC Penyy's in 1998 .
Um, NO. Even if there were any players at that price point you would be an absolute sucker to buy it. look to spend $200-$300 on a quality universal piece. Look to spend $400-$500 for one that will do all audio permats and your prograssive scan video VERY well (such as pioneer elite's and denon's models)